中文摘要：

为了筛选花生抗旱性鉴定评价指标,构建评价体系,利用177个株系组成的花生重组自交系群体为研究对象,连续2年在充分灌溉和干旱胁迫条件下种植,收获考种后分析了22个表型性状、2个生理指标与抗旱系数间的相关关系。结果表明：总分枝数、结果枝数、结果节数、单株果数、百仁质量这5个表型性状的干旱胁迫指数以及叶绿素含量、冠层温度2个生理指标的抗旱性综合评价值均与抗旱系数有显著相关关系,这7个性状可作为判定花生抗旱性的评价指标。以抗旱系数≥1.1为标准,筛选到3个抗旱株系,即L19、L121和L146。

英文摘要：

Objective ： To observe the clinical efficacy of Edema Formula foot bath in the assistant treatment of nephrotic syndrome. Methods ： 80 patients who admitted to our hospital with nephrotic syndrome were randomly divided into two groups. 40 cases in the control group were given the general medical treatment （ Shuxuening Injection once a day with 15-20 mL for dripping to improve renal microcirculation, ARB drugs to control blood pressure and reduce proteinuria, dipyridamole tablets for anti platelet aggregation, statins for regulating blood lipids, PPI for oral mucosal protection, etc. ）for a month for a course. The experimental group＇s 40 patients added Edema Formula foot bath [Honghua（safflower） 15 g, Chishao （red peony root） 15 g, Taoren （peach kernel）IS g, Guizhi（cassia twig） 15 g, Wujiapi （acanthopanax bark）20 g, Mugua （papaya）20 g, Tougucao （Speranskia）15 g] once a day and one month was a course. After treatment, the calf circumference 15 cm above both the anterior and posterior external malleolus and the finger pressure changes, hematuria and proteinuria were observed. Results ： （1） Compared with before treatment, the calf circumference 15 cm above both the anterior and posterior external malleolus and the finger pressure changes of the two groups decreased and the experimental group was superior to the control group and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.（2）After treatment, both groups＇ patients proteinuria and hematuria and the specific gravity of urine improved in the experimental group. The proteinuria in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group and the differencewas statistically significant （P〈0.05）. The specific gravity after treatment in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group and the difference was statistically significant （ P〈0.05 ）. （3）After treatment, the experimental group＇s total effective rate （ 92.5% ）was significantly high