中文摘要：

目的：考察简化情绪量表中文版的信度和效度。方法：采用分层抽样，从4所中学选取1728名中学生，进行简化情绪量表的信度和效度分析。以长处和困难问卷与儿童焦虑性情绪障碍筛查表为效标关联效度，随机抽取30名中学生间隔4周重测，评定重测信度。结果：简化情绪量表中文版的Cronbaeh α系数为0．89，P〈0．01，重测相关系数为0．84，P〈0．01。简化情绪量表中文版与长处和困难问卷的情绪症状因子相关（r=0．67，P〈0．01），与儿童焦虑性情绪障碍筛查表的躯体化／惊恐、广泛性焦虑、分离性焦虑、社交恐怖、学校恐怖因子及总分的相关系数分别为0．69、0．77、0．57、0．44、0．57、0．75，均P〈0．01。探索性因素分析各条目的因素负荷在0．54—0．73之间，主成分分析共抽取2个因子，解释变异量的50．6％。验证性因素分析的拟合指标X^2／df、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI分别为7．28、0．06、0．96、0．94、0．97、0．98。结论：简化情绪量表中文版的信度、效度均较理想，符合心理计量学要求。

英文摘要：

Objective： To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire （SMFQ） . Methods： Using stratified cluster sampling, a total of 1728 students from four middle schools were tested. The split-half reliability , test-retest reliability , internal consistency reliability were reexamined. A factor analysis procedure was used to explore the factor structure of SMFQ. The criterion-related validity was evaluated through correlating SMFQ with Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire （ SDQ ） and Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders [SCARED） . Thirty students completed SMFQ retest 4 weeks later. Results： The Cronbach＇s α coefficient was 0. 89 （ P 〈 0. 01 ） ; the test-retest reliability was 0. 84 （ P 〈 0. 01 ） . Significant correlations were found between SMFQ and SDQ subseales of emotional symptoms （ r = 0. 67 ） and SCARED （ r = 0.75 ） . Exploratory factor analysis extracted 2 components, and the percentage of variance explained was 50. 6%. Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the fit indexes for X^2/df, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, NNFI, CFI were 7.28, 0. 06, 0.96, 0. 94, 0. 97 and 0. 98 respectively. Conclusion： The SFMQ have good psychometrics properties, with adequate reliability and validity, and canbe is applicable to assess the mood of Chinese adolescents.