位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
堆载预压径竖向固结等体积应变解答
  • ISSN号:1000-4548
  • 期刊名称:《岩土工程学报》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:TU472.3[建筑科学—结构工程;建筑科学—土工工程]
  • 作者机构:[1]河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏南京210098, [2]河海大学岩土工程科学研究所,江苏南京210098, [3]盐城市交通工程咨询监理有限责任公司,江苏盐城224001
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金项目(51278171):中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(201IB02814);2010年度江苏省高校青蓝工程项目
中文摘要:

现有的含竖向水体地基固结问题的解析解答大都是在传统的等竖向应变假设基础上建立的,而且在考虑涂抹区土体的渗流和压缩作用方面,还没有真实地体现出涂抹区土体的竖向渗透系数和体积压缩系数,其对地基固结的影响也尚不明确。为此,针对含竖向排水体地基径竖向同时固结的轴对称问题,采用等体积应变假设,考虑井阻作用、涂抹作用、随时间线性堆载预压以及地基附加球应力任意分布,推导了完整的径竖向固结微分方程的解答,给出了超静孔隙水压力和固结度的显式表达式,分析了侧向变形即泊松比效应以及涂抹区土体的竖向渗透系数和三维体积压缩系数对地基整体平均固结度的影响。结果表明,泊松比效应较为明显,基于传统的等竖向应变假设的解答高估了地基的固结速率;小考虑涂抹区土体体积压缩的解答虽然也高估了地基的固结速率,但影响有限;而涂抹区土体的竖向渗透系数对于地基固结的影响则几乎可忽略不计。

英文摘要:

The available analytical solutions for ground consolidation with vertical drains are mostly established based on the traditional equal vertical strain assumption. Moreover, in the aspect of considering the effects of seepage and compression of the soil within the smeared zone, the vertical hydraulic conductivity and the coefficient of volume compressibility of the smeared soil are not really embodied, and then their impacts on the ground consolidation are not clear. Therefore, the equal volumetric strain assumption is adopted to solve the axisymmetric problem of radial and vertical ground consolidation with vertical drains. The effects of well resistance and smear are considered, together with a linearly time-varied surcharge preloading and an arbitrarily distributed mean stress increase in the ground. Solutions are derived from a complete set of partial differential equations of radial and vertical consolidation. Explicit expressions for the excess pore water pressure and degree of consolidation are presented. The influences of the lateral deformation, i.e., Poisson's ratio effect, the vertical hydraulic conductivity and the three-dimensional coefficient of volume compressibility of the smeared soil, on the overall mean values of degree of ground consolidation are analyzed. It shows that the Poisson's ratio effect is significant. The solutions derived based on the traditional equal vertical strain assumption overestimate the consolidation rate of the ground. The solutions derived without consideration of the volume compressibility of the smeared soil also overestimate the consolidation rate, but to a limited extent. Nevertheless, the influence of the vertical hydraulic conductivity of the smeared soil on the ground consolidation is negligible.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《岩土工程学报》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中国科协
  • 主办单位:中国水利学会 中国土木工程学会 中国力学学会 中国建筑学会 中国水力发电工程学会 中国振动工程学会
  • 主编:蔡正银
  • 地址:南京虎踞关34号
  • 邮编:210024
  • 邮箱:ge@nhri.cn
  • 电话:025-85829553 85829534
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1000-4548
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:32-1124/TU
  • 邮发代号:28-62
  • 获奖情况:
  • 中国科协二等奖,江苏省首届优秀期刊奖,连续三次被评为核心期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),荷兰文摘与引文数据库,美国工程索引,美国剑桥科学文摘,日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:54826