中文摘要：

高等学校职称评审的完全结果公正是难以实现的,因此有助于结果公正实现的程序公正尤为重要。科学严密的程序设计能够使评审结果具有不容置疑的公正性。通过对我国三所大学与美英两所大学职称评审程序的比较研究,我国大学职称评审在指标分配、最低标准设置、岗位分类设置、同行评审、系级评审、学科组评审以及票决规则等方面还存在一些问题,对此提出了相关政策建议：正确认识教师分类管理,科学确定评价标准和教学科研权重;科学设岗,提高指标分配的科学性;加强基层测评和学科评审,提高教师的参与度和有效性;重视同行评审,充分发挥同行评审的作用;科学制定票决的规则与程序,提高评委会票决的科学性。

英文摘要：

It is impracticable to achieve complete result justice in faculty promotion.Thus,procedural justice,which benefits result justice,is of great importance.A well-designed procedure with scientific rigor definitely contributes to fairness in promotion decisions.By comparing the faculty promotion procedure in three Chinese universities and two universities in western countries,we find problems still exist with faculty promotion in Chinese universities in quota distribution,minimum standard setting,job position classification,peer review,department-level evaluation,program-level evaluation,and voting rules.Correspondingly,we make the following suggestions：correctly understanding the categorical faculty management and setting reasonable evaluation standards and reasonable weights for teaching and research;establishing job positions in such a way as to improve the quota distribution;strengthening frontline evaluation and within-program evaluation to improve teachers＇ participation and evaluation validity;attaching importance to peer review to fully exert its effects;and developing the voting rules and procedure judiciously to enhance the voting soundness.