欢迎您！东篱公司
退出
-
申报数据库
-
立项数据库
-
成果数据库
-
项目获奖数据库
中文摘要：
我国驰名商标的认定与保护存在司法与行政双轨并行的现象。对于行政与司法两种模式，就一具体个案而言，前者认定与保护的主体分离；后者认定与保护的主体一致。就认定涉案的范围与保护可用的手段观之，行政模冬涉案的范围较窄，保护可用的手段有限；司法模式认定涉寨的范围较广，保护可用的手段充分。从认定与保护的效力上看，驰名商标的司法与行政认定，具有基于驰名动态性的异案同效和基于司法终决权的同案异效的特征。
英文摘要：
In China, there is the judicial and administrative modes paralleled in well- known trademarks＇ protection and determination. In the specific case, the former is isolated from the subject while the latter is consistenv with it. From the perspectives of the scope and approaches, the administrative mode is narrower and the means of protection is limited. Considering effectiveness, the determination of well- known trademarks has the characters of dynamic effectiveness in one case and different effectiveness in separate cases.
同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
位置：