位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
腹主动脉瘤大小对腔内隔绝术及其疗效的影响
  • ISSN号:0529-5815
  • 期刊名称:《中华外科杂志》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R543.16[医药卫生—心血管疾病;医药卫生—临床医学;医药卫生—内科学] R734.5[医药卫生—肿瘤;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:[1]第二军医大学附属长海医院血管外科全军血管外科研究所,上海200433
  • 相关基金:国家十一五“863”计划基金资助项目(2006AA0224E2);上海市卫生系统百名跨世纪优秀学科带头人计划基金(97BR047);军队“十五”重大临床技术攻关项目(31070926)
中文摘要:

目的探讨腹主动脉瘤大小对腔内隔绝术及隔绝后治疗结果的影响。方法回顾性分析1997年3月至2007年6月共429例腹主动脉瘤的临床资料,依腹主动脉瘤直径将患者分为〈55mm组(A组,n=274)及≥55mm组(B组,n=155)。根据术前影像学资料研究两组动脉瘤大小、瘤颈长度、瘤颈直径、瘤颈扭曲程度及髂动脉是否受累等,并探讨动脉瘤大小对腔内隔绝术及治疗结果的影响。结果A组平均年龄71.1岁,B组73.7岁(P〈0.05)。B组有冠心病史者(36.1%)明显多于A组(18.6%)(P〈0.05),B组伴高血压病、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病者多于A组,但两组间差异无统计学意义。A组腹主动脉瘤平均直径为(46.6±6.8)mm,B组为(66.8±11.2)mm(P〈0.05);B组腹主动脉瘤较A组近端瘤颈短、瘤颈直径大、瘤颈扭曲、易累及髂动脉(P〈0.05);B组患者应用腹膜外径路、髂内动脉重建或髂内动脉栓塞等附加手术、术中牵张导丝均多于A组,术中发生内漏数及使用移植物个数均高于A组(P〈0.05)。围手术期并发症发生率B组高于A组,病死率无明显差异。术后B组内漏率及二次干预率均高于A组。结论腔内隔绝术治疗腹主动脉瘤获得了较好的临床效果,而腹主动脉瘤的大小对腔内隔绝术存在一定影响,较小腹主动脉瘤无论在术中操作、围手术期并发症、术后随访等方面均优于较大腹主动脉瘤。

英文摘要:

Objective To evaluate the effect of the diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) on endovascular exclusion (EVE) and its results. Methods From March 1997 to June 2007, 429 AAA patients were treated with endovascular stent-graft exclusion. According to the maximal diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm, the patients were divided into two groups : group A ( diameter 〈 55 mm, n = 274) and group B ( diameter≥55 mm, n = 155 ). The diameter of AAA, involvement of iliac artery, length, diameter and distortion of aneurismal neck in the two groups were recorded and compared retrospectively. Results Patients in group B were significantly older than group A (73.7 vs 71.1 years, P 〈 0. 05 ). More patients in group B was complicated with coronary artery disease than those in group A ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The mean diameter of AAA in group A was (46. 6 ± 6. 8 ) mm, and ( 66. 8 ±11.2 ) mm in group B ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Proximal aneurysmal necks were shorter, wider and more tortuous in group B than those in group A (P 〈 0. 05 ). Extraperitoneal approach, embolism of inner iliac artery and reconstruction of another inner iliac artery and stretch technique were more applied in group B. There were more endoleak during operation in group B and more stent-grafts were used. There was significant difference in morbility rate between the two groups, while no statistic difference in mortality. And in group B, there were a high rate of endoleak and secondary intervention post operation. Conclusions The diameter of AAA affects EVE and its results. In small aneurysms, EVE carries better outcome than in big aneurysms.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《中华外科杂志》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中国科学技术协会
  • 主办单位:中华医学会
  • 主编:赵玉沛
  • 地址:北京市东四西大街42号
  • 邮编:100710
  • 邮箱:cmacjs@cma.org.cn
  • 电话:010-85158180
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:0529-5815
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-2139/R
  • 邮发代号:2-59
  • 获奖情况:
  • 1997年三部委评选第二届全国优秀科技期刊三等奖、...,1999年首届国家期刊奖、2002年第二届国家期刊奖,2000年获国家自然科学基金资助期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),荷兰文摘与引文数据库,美国生物医学检索系统,日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:77672