对《县级土地整治规划编制规程(报批稿)》中以新增耕地系数、新增耕地面积或整治规模为潜力判别标准提出异议。以神木县为例,从质量、数量、经济、人为四方面选取指标测算其农用地整治潜力;借助SPSS软件,按照新增耕地系数、新增耕地面积、整治规模和综合潜力分别进行潜力分级。结果表明:《县级土地整治规划编制规程(报批稿)》中的潜力判别标准并不能全面反映评价单元的整治潜力水平,而多因素综合评价法可解决这一问题。
We Raise an objection to the" Land Renovation Planning Regulation at the County Level (draft) " in which the new cultivated land coefficient, new cultivated area or improvement scale are applied for the only potential identifying standard. For example, in Shenmu county, we measured the potential of farmland regulation from the four aspects of quality, quantity, economic and human indicators ; and with the aid of SPSS software we classified the potentials respectively according to the coefficient of the cultivated land, new cultivated area, improvement scale and comprehensive potential. The results show that the " Land Reclamation Planning regulations at county - Level (draft)" for discriminant standard does not fully reflect the level of potential evaluation unit, and multi -factor comprehensive evaluation method can solve the problem.