从编委、稿源、语言、流通4个方面调查韩国学术期刊的国际化状况,考察NRF、KOFST、KISTI等机构促进学术期刊国际化的一些具体政策措施。研究结果表明:韩国学术期刊总的国际化水准还比较低,但编委国际化、流通国际化方面相对较好,医学期刊国际化水准相对较高;韩国基本形成了一个较为完备的促进学术期刊国际化的支持系统,其期刊国际化资助计划涵盖了期刊的投稿、审稿/编辑、发行、流通等全过程。根据韩国学术期刊国际化进程的经验教训,提出了中国学术期刊国际化路径的建议。
In this study, we investigated the international editorial boards, international sources of manuscripts, the degree of English use and international distribution channels of the academic journals of South Korea. We also investigated some specific policies of NRF, KOFST and KISTI to promote the internationalization of academic journals. The resuhs show that the international level of Korean academic journals is still relatively low in general, but the international editorial board and international distribution channels are relatively good, and the international level of medical journals is higher than that of journals in other fields. In addition, NRF, KOFST and KISTI have a basic supporting system, which includes the whole process of journal submissions, proofreading/editing, publishing, and circulation, to promote the internationalization of academic journals. Finally, based on the experience and lessons learned from the process of internationalization of the academic journals of Korea, we made recommendations for the internationalization of Chinese academic journals.