中文摘要：

为衡量工业增长对资源的消耗和环境的污染，本文构建了“工业绿色增长指数”，并运用基于松弛测度的方向距离函数（SBM—I）DF）对2007—2011年中国30省（区、市）进行测算，根据得分将其分成高绿化度地区、中绿化度地区和低绿化度地区；采用面板数据模型测算了行政型、市场型和公众参与型这三种类型的环境规制对工业绿色增长指数的影响，同时考察技术创新、工业结构对工业绿色增长的作用程度。研究发现：东部地区的工业绿色增长指数高于中西部地区；行政型和市场型环境趣制对工业绿色增长的作用显著，市场型环境规制在高、审绿化度地区起主要作用，而低绿化度地区以行政型环境规制为主；公众参与型环境规制对工业绿色增长的作用有限；技术伺新和工业结构也是影响工业绿色增长的重要因素。为促进工业绿色发展，中西部地区要树立绿色、低碳的理念对东部地区所转移的产业进行选择；高绿化度地区需在提高排污费标准的同时，逐步采用排污权交易等方式加大对环境污染总量的控制力度；低绿化度地区可在实行低标准排污费政策的同时，逐步实现从行政型向市场型环境规制的转变；逐步发挥并扩大公众参与型环境规制的作用；注重与节能减排相关的技术吸收和应用推广，降低高载能行业的比重。

英文摘要：

This paper builds Green Growth Index of Industry （GGII） for measuring the green growth of industry. Based on SBM-DDF, the paper calculates the provincial GGII in China from 2007 to 2011, and divides 30 provinces（ autonomous regions and municipalities） into three groups in terms of their scores from high to low. For each group, the paper looks into the difference among effects of three types of environmental regulation, which are administrative regulation, market-based regulation, and public participating regulation by panel-data model. Moreover, the impacts of technology innovation and industrial structure are analyzed. This paper reveals that： first, the GGII in the East is dramatically higher than that in the Mid and West. Second, administrative regulation and market-based regulation are effective for green growth of industry, and market-based regulation takes effect in high and intermediate GGII regions, while low GGII region generally relys on administrative regulation. Third, the impact of public participating regulation is limited. Fourthly, technology innovation and industrial structure are also important factors for industrial green growth. Therefore, the Mid and West needs to establish green, low-carbon notion on the selection of eastern transferred industries; high GGII region needs to improve standards of pollution charge, and gradually adopt pollution rights trading to control the total pollution; low GGII region needs to implement the low-standard pollution charge policy, and transform from administrative regulation driven to market based; public participating regulation should be greatly encouraged as well ; it is necessary to digest and promote applications of technologies related to energy conservation and emission reduction, and the proportion of energy-intensive industry should be reduced.