中文摘要：

研究采用潜在转变分析探究了青少年自我伤害行为的发展。对3600名青少年进行为期18个月的追踪，对其自我伤害行为进行了三次测量。通过纵向数据分析识别出过渡组这一以往研究未发现的群体，该组被试仅出现程度较轻的自我伤害行为，且占总体的比例随时间快速下降。通过转变矩阵解释了过渡组和高发组的不稳定性是自我伤害行为发生率降低的原因，并发现冲动性、负向情绪等个体易感因素比家庭等人际因素对自我伤害行为存在更为显著的预测作用。在性别差异上，女生比男生更容易产生自我伤害行为，也更容易受到各方面因素的影响。最后，文章针对青少年自我伤害行为的预防和控制工作提出了建议。

英文摘要：

In recent years, the incidence of self-injury in adolescents has shown an upward trend year by year. The high prevalence of self-injury and various accompanied adverse consequences （e.g., declined academic performance and damaged interpersonal relationships） are becoming serious public concerns. To provide insight on prevention and intervention program, this study examines the properties and development of self-injury behaviors in adolescents. It is of interest to study impulsive behaviors in a categorical and latent approach, so that the subgroups of adolescents based on different patterns of observed behavior can be found as well as a single strategy aimed at the underlying trait effective in preventing all forms of self-injury behaviors. Taking a longitudinal perspective enable researchers to understand which individuals are expected to transition to more risky groups in the future and vice versa. Latent transition model was used to examine 10 self-injury behaviors, i.e., self-cutting, burning, biting, punching, carving words or pictures on the skin, scratching skin, inserting objects to the nail or skin, pulling hair out, erasing skin, banging the head or other parts of the body against the wall over three waves in the present study. Questions of stability and change were examined with a model that accounts for possible transitions. Participants were 3,600 students （2,037 girls） from secondary schools （mean age = 14.63 ± 1.25） in Hong Kong, China. Gender was used as a grouping variable to explore the differences in latent structure. Nine covariates, i.e., age, family factors（depression, anxiety, stress）, impulsivity, distress tolerance and emotional disorder（parental marital status, parental relationship, parent criticism） were examined as predictors of status of self-injury behaviors. Three distinct groups are found： Non-self-injurers, Experimenters, Repeaters. Non-self-injurers was the most prevalent status and they barely involve in any self-injury behavior; the prevalence of Experim