中文摘要：

认识的语境论在回应怀疑论难题的过程中，出现了多种修正的形式，包括以相对标准修正的语境论，以事实作为原因修正的语境论，以妥协方式修正的语境论，以证据修正的语境论，以预设修正的语境论。这些不同形式的语境论遇到了“斑马悖论”和摩尔主义的反驳，但语境论者认为这两个反驳不一定有效，正是它们忽视了语境的作用，才导致悖论的出现，要解决怀疑论难题，还得回到特定语境中去。

英文摘要：

Many amendatory forms of epistemic contextualism have been emerged in the course of sol- ving skeptical paradox. As the author named, they are relative criterion eontextualism, fact - as - cause contextualism, transigent contextualism, evidential contextualism and presuppositional contextualism, which come into the objections of zebra paradox and Mooreanism. But Contextualists argue that the two ob- jections are not efficiency, because they ignore the role of context. If we want to solve skeptical paradox, we should come back to contextualism.