中文摘要：

对中国农村居民点整理潜力研究进行了回顾和展望,寻找存在的不足,探讨今后的研究方向。研究表明：①相关的农村居民点整理潜力理论主要有农村宅基地转型理论、空心村理论以及农村居民点演变规律等,这些理论可以为农村居民点整理潜力的测算和挖潜措施的制定提供依据;②农村居民点整理潜力的内涵多被界定为整理增加耕地面积的潜力,其主要测算方法有人均建设用地标准法、户均建设用地标准法和农村居民点内部土地闲置率法三种;③整理增加耕地系数是当前农村居民点整理潜力分级的主要依据;④相关的农村居民点挖潜政策措施主要有城乡建设用地增减挂钩政策、新农村建设政策和城乡统筹政策三个。今后,农村居民点整理潜力研究可在以下几个方面进行改善：①理论研究亟需多学科理论的融合以搭建新的框架,加强理论框架对潜力测算方法的指导;②潜力内涵应更加注重整理增加土地面积的表述,人均建设用地标准法的修正需更加系统,潜力分级指标需更加有针对性;③加强城乡建设用地增减挂钩、新农村建设、城乡统筹三个政策与农村居民点挖潜关系的梳理,为潜力挖掘提供足够的政策支持和方法保障。

英文摘要：

This paper reviewed and previewed the research on land consolidation potential of rural habitat（LCPRH） in China.This papercan be concluded as：① there are three primary theories related to LCPRH i.e.rural housing land transition,rural hollowing,and evolution of rural habitat which can provide rural habitat consolidation references for potential calculation and potential exploration.②The concept of LCPRH is always defined as cultivated land area increased by consolidation.Three methods are usually adopted in potential calculation i.e.method of constructive land standard per capita,method of constructive land standard per farm household and method of idle land rate for rural habitat.③ The cultivated land coefficient increased by consolidation is often utilized to rank potential level.④Connection of urban construction land increase and rural construction land decrease,new rural construction and urban-rural integration are the three central policies concerned with potential exploration.In the end,the suggestions were put forward as follows：① multi-disciplinary theories should be meshed so as to establish a new theory framework of LCPRH which can be utilized to guide the potential calculation method better.②Increased land area equally important to cultivated land area should be paid much attention in the concept depiction of LCPRH.The revision for method of constructive land standard per capita should be more systemic and logistic.The rank indexes for LCPRH should be selected more targeted.③ The relationship between potential exploration and three policies should be made clearer in order to provide enough supports forpolicy establishment and technique utilization in LCPRH.