位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
改良腹腔镜腹膜透析管置管与开腹置管的临床效果对比观察
  • ISSN号:0376-2491
  • 期刊名称:《中华医学杂志》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R692.5[医药卫生—泌尿科学;医药卫生—临床医学;医药卫生—外科学]
  • 作者机构:浙江省人民医院肾脏病科,杭州310014
  • 相关基金:浙江省科技厅重大专项(2014C03047-2);浙江省部共建项目(WKJ2013-2-002);浙江省医药卫生一般项目(2015KYA025);浙江省中医药科研项目(2015ZA011);浙江省中医药科研项目(2016ZA032);浙江省卫生高层次医坛新秀人才培养工程项目(2013)
中文摘要:

目的探讨肾脏病科医生实施腹腔镜下腹壁悬吊法腹膜透析置管术的临床效果。方法选择浙江省人民医院肾脏病科2011年1月至2016年5月住院手术的188例患者,分别采用腹腔镜下腹壁悬吊法(改良腹腔镜置管组)(A组)59例和常规开腹手术法(开腹手术组)(B组)129例行腹膜透析管置管术,并对两组患者的一般情况、原发病、既往手术史、检验结果、手术时间、术后近期及远期并发症、手术费用等进行对比分析。结果A组既往腹部手术史比例11.9%,而B组为0(χ^2=15.897,P〈0.001);A组手术时间(38.9±12.8)min,而B组(64.1±12.7)min(t=-6.4666,P=0.0000);A组手术费用(5488.4±156.1)元,而B组(1602.7±48.9)元(t=257.129,P=0.0000);1个月内导管移位A组为0,B组11.6%(χ^2=7.4553,P=0.003);A组术后疼痛为15.3%,B组为41.9%(χ^2=12.8622,P=0.000);1个月后导管移位A组是0,B组是16.3%(χ^2=10.8124,P=0.000);1个月后A组疝气13.6%,B组为3.1%(χ^2=7.4105,P=0.010)。两组在腹腔出血、术后1个月内和1个月后腹膜炎、胸腹漏、导管堵塞等差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论腹腔镜下腹壁悬吊法腹膜透析置管术在慢性肾衰竭既往有腹部手术史、重新置腹透管、手术时间、减少腹透管移位、减少术中及术后疼痛等方面有优势,但仍存在渗漏、疝气等并发症。

英文摘要:

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of the modified laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters by nephrologists. Methods A total of 188 patients diagnosed as end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled, who received catheter and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) therapy from January 2011 to May 2016 in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. They were divided into group A ( with modified laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters, n = 59 ) and group B (with conventional placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter, n = 129 ). The demographic and clinical characteristics, past abdominal operation history, surgery time, hospital stay after operation, expenses for surgery and hospitalization, early and late complications including bleeding, pain, leakage, peritonitis and catheter displacement were observed. Results Patients with previous abdominal surgery accounted for 11.9% in group A and 0 in group B(χ^2 = 15. 897 ,P 〈 0. 001 ). The duration of the operation was (38. 9 ± 12. 8)min in group A and (64. 1 ± 12. 7)rain in group B(t = -6. 466 6, P =0. 000 0). The cost of the operation was (5 488.4 ± 156. 1 ) yuan in group A and ( 1 602. 7 ±48. 92) yuan in group B (t = 257. 129, P =0. 000 0). Catheter displacement within one month was observed in 0 and 11.6% (χ^2 = 7.455 3, P = 0.003), pain in 15.3% and 41.9% (χ^2 = 12. 862 2, P = 0.000), and catheter displacement after one month in 0 and in 16. 3% (χ^2 = 10. 812 4, P =0. 000) of the patients, respectively in group A and group B. The incidences of peritonitis within one month and beyond one month, leakage,bleeding and so on showed no difference between the two groups (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusions Placement of PD catheter with laparoscope is suitable for renal failure patients with abdominal operation history and replacement PD catheter. It also has the advantages of shorter surgery time, less pain and lower incidences of catheter displacement, expanding the

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《中华医学杂志》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:中国科学技术协会
  • 主办单位:中华医学会
  • 主编:
  • 地址:北京市东四西大街42号
  • 邮编:100710
  • 邮箱:nmjc@cma.org.cn
  • 电话:010-85158355 85158180
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:0376-2491
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-2137/R
  • 邮发代号:2-588
  • 获奖情况:
  • 1992年与1996年连续两次在中宣部、国家科委、新闻...,1999年、2003年分别荣获首届国家期刊奖和第二届国...,中国期刊方阵“双高”期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),荷兰文摘与引文数据库,荷兰医学文摘,美国生物医学检索系统,日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:101941