中文摘要：

科研成果的商业化转化过程中,各方利益分配方案会随该成果有无专利权保护,以及专利权属于个人还是组织的不同而不同。科学家、科学家所在组织、企业三者之间的利益博弈分析表明,无专利保护时,组织不会参与成果转化,科学家以隐性知识价值参与分配,获得相对较少的利益,而有专利保护且专利权属于科学家时,科学家的利益因隐性知识和专利权的双重价值而大大增加,但组织仍然没有动力参与成果转化;当有专利保护且专利权属于组织时,采用Shapley值法分配,专利权价值使组织获得的利益为三者中最多,从而有足够动力积极参与转化过程,科学家则致力于研究工作并凭借隐性知识参与转化,且其利益多于没有专利保护情形。

英文摘要：

In the commercializing process of RD achievements,the gain that the involved beneficiaries got was different based on the conditions that if these achievements had patent right and whom the right belonged to.The profit analysis in the scientists,organization of scientists and manufactory according to the game theory showed that if patent right was unavailable,organization wouldn＇t take part in the commercializing process,while the scientists get the lesser profit only depending on their tacit knowledge.However,if patent right was available and belonged to the scientists,scientists＇ profit increased greatly because the dual value of patent and tacit knowledge,but the organization still had no motivation to participate the commercializing process.Furthermore,if patent right was available and belonged to the organization,Shapley value algorithm showed that the organization got the most profit in the three beneficiaries by virtue of the value of patent right,and would participate the commercializing process actively,while the scientists would focus on the RD work and get more profit than that brought by the condition of no patent right by right of the value of their tacit knowledge.