位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
两种骨质疏松筛选方法在绝经后骨质疏松妇女中的应用比较
  • ISSN号:1006-7108
  • 期刊名称:《中国骨质疏松杂志》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R814[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学;医药卫生—放射医学;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:[1]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院骨质疏松科,骨代谢病和遗传研究室,上海200233
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30570891,30771019和30800387);上海市科委优秀学科带头人计划资助项目(08XD1403000)
中文摘要:

目的分别评估亚洲骨质疏松筛查工具(OSTA)及上海市绝经后妇女低骨量简易筛选方法(STLBMS)与上海市绝经后妇女骨密度及椎体骨折的关系,并比较两种筛选方法对骨质疏松和椎体骨折发生的预测能力。方法共入选988例绝经后妇女,有或无脊椎压缩性骨折各494例。两组均用双能X线吸收仪检测腰椎和股骨近端骨密度,并计算OSTA与STLBMS指数。结果两种筛选法均显示骨折组风险指数更高(P〈0.001);在两组中分别比较两种筛选法,均显示STLBMS法的风险指数更高(P〈0.001)。OSTA与STLBMS指数与骨密度均正相关(r=0.336~0.562和r=0.383~0.570,P均〈0.001);而两种筛选指数间呈显著正相关(r=0.974,P〈0.001)。以OSTA≤-1和STLBMS≤5为分界点,OSTA与STLBMS法诊断骨质疏松的工作曲线,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.73和0.74;在预测椎体骨折方面,OSTA与STLBMS法的AUC分别为0.55和0.57。结论OSTA和STLBMS筛选法均与骨密度呈显著正相关,也有助于椎体骨折的发现,两种方法对骨质疏松和椎体骨折发生的预测能力没有统计学差异,是理想的骨质疏松筛选工具。

英文摘要:

Objective To estimate the relationship of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) and a simple screening tool for low bone mass of Shanghai (STLBMS) with bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral fracture in Shanghai postmenopausal women. We also compared the ability of these two screening tools to predict osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. Methods 988 postmenopausal women were included: 494 with vertebral fractures and the other 494 without. BMD at spine and proximal femur were measured by dual-energy X- ray absorptiometry. OSTA and STLBMS indices were calculated. Results Both indices demonstrated that the fracture group had higher risk indices( P 〈 0.001 ). Both groups showed that higher risk indices with STLBMS index( P 〈 0.001 ). BMD at the L1_4 and proximal femur showed positive correlation with OSTA and STLBMS index (r = 0.336-0.562 and r = 0.383-0.57, all P 〈 0.001). These two methods correlated more significantly( r = 0.974, P 〈 0.001). The OSTA values of ≤ - 1 and STLBMS values of ≤5 could diagnose osteoporosis with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.73 and 0.74. They could predict postmenopausal vertebral fracture with an AUG of 0.55 and 0.57. Conclusions We concluded that OSTA and STLBMS positively correlated with BMD and might be helpful to identify postmenopausal women increased risk of vertebral fracture. Our data showed no difference between the ability of these two screening tools to predict osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. Both of them were ideal tools for screening osteoporosis.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《中国骨质疏松杂志》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国民政部
  • 主办单位:中国老年学和老年医学学会
  • 主编:张萌萌
  • 地址:北京市朝阳区望京西园三区309-703
  • 邮编:100102
  • 邮箱:info@china-osteofound.org
  • 电话:010-64727035 64705247
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1006-7108
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-3701/R
  • 邮发代号:82-198
  • 获奖情况:
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 美国化学文摘(网络版),中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版)
  • 被引量:15856