中文摘要：

扶贫与生态环境保护作为可持续发展的莺要组成部分，已经成为全世界共同关注的焦点。然而实践中实现两者协同的案例非常鲜见，迄今对贫困与生态环境退化相互关系的认识仍然比较模糊，甚至还存在较大争论。副绕贫网与生态环境相瓦关系的理论渊源与研究脉络，梳理了学术界关于其原因与结果的争论的不同思想流派。仵此基础上，指出日前研究的特点与趋势：总体层面上将贫困LJ牛态环境问题置于同一分析框架内，微观层f研上关注贫凼人群并强调对其牛计的保护，宏观层而探讨全球气候变化对贫困的影响及贫困人群与扶贫政策的适应，视角上尝试多学科交叉并推进多尺度融合。研究有助于揭示贫困与生念环境演变卡目互作用的内在机制，并为中国和其他发展中国家制守协同扶佾与，仁奈坏培僻护的酌篙幌僦有荔供蠊

英文摘要：

As two essential parts of sustainable development, the poverty alleviation and environmental protec- tion have become the focuses around the world. However, there are few successful attempts that aimed to inte- grate the economic and environmental objectives in practice. The knowledge of the relationship between the poverty and environmental degradation is still obscure and sometimes in debate so far. Historically, there are two theoretical origins on the relationship between poverty and environment. One is the some of pessimism af- fected by poverty trap and Environmental Kuznets Curve, which regards poverty and environmental degrada- tion as a downward spiral or a mutually reinforcing vicious cycle. The other is the relatively optimistic argu- ment, which emphasizes the possibility of integrating poverty alleviation and environmental protection due to the progress of technology. There are many debates about the causality of the poverty and environmental degra- dation, despite most scholars agreed that poverty is one of the consequences and the poor are the victims of en- vironmental degradation. However, there are wide differences among varied schools on whether environment degradation was caused by poverty or not. The first school attributed the environmental degradation to poverty or the poor. On the contrary, the second school attributed environmental degradation to the relatively wealthy country, region or the rich. The third school seems to integrate the former two schools and argued that poverty and environmental degradation were affected by varied factors and the conventional linear relationship is too simple and arbitrary. Based on it, it is concluded that there are four characteristics and trends about the re- search, i.e., putting the poverty and environment into one analytical framework on the whole, focusing on the poor and emphasizing their livelihoods at the micro level, exploring the impact of climate change on poverty and its adaptation at the macro level, and promoting the interdisciplinary and