中文摘要：

文章运用1997—2006年面板数据，以新增长理论的内生创新努力（R＆D活动）为基准，实证分析本土技术溢出与国际技术溢出对中国高技术产业创新的影响，从中发现：在本土技术溢出中，大学等科研机构对产业创新存在积极的溢出效应，产业空间集聚的溢出效应呈不稳定性特征；在国际技术溢出渠道中，出口学习对创新有非常明显的促进作用，而外资R＆D活动的溢出效应不明显。进一步考察国际技术溢出效果与开放程度、开放模式关系后发现：就开放程度来看，国际技术溢出效果随开放程度的提高而提高；就开放模式来看，外资R＆D主导型模式的溢出效果不明显，出口导向型模式的溢出效果较明显，而双重推进型——“引进来、走出去”模式的溢出效果很明显。

英文摘要：

Taking the endogenous-innovation effort （namely R＆D） in new growth theories as a benchmark, the paper empirically investigates the impact of indigenous and international technology spillovers on the high-tech industrial innovation in China based on the panel data from 1997 to 2006. The results indicate that, for indigenous technology spillover, research institutions like universities have positive effects on industrial innovation and the spillover of industrial cluster is featured by instability. As to international technology spillover, learning-by-exporting can significantly promote the innovation, but the R＆D activities of foreign investment have no effects on the innovation. From the angle of opening-up degree, the international technology spillover increases as the opening-up degree raises. From the angle of opening-up mode, the foreign R＆D oriented mode lacks effects on innovation, and the exports-oriented mode has significant effects on the innovation. The bringing-in-and-going-out mode has the most significant effects on the innovation.