中文摘要：

法国学者塞拉利尼的转基因致癌论文在学术界和国际社会引起了极大关注与争议。在对塞拉利尼论文发表的各界反应及相关研究文献追溯的基础上,对其试验材料、试验设计、数据统计等进行了分析。研究结果表明,塞拉利尼的研究,存在试验材料无法确保其结论的唯一性、试验样本不能保证其研究结论的可重现性,以及试验结果存在多种解读等问题。研究结果也对塞拉利尼论文所发杂志的审稿制度提出了质疑,认为这是塞拉利尼论文目前仍是影响国际社会对转基因安全性争议的原因之一。此外,在其施引文献中,有试验数据支撑的研究结果均表明了转基因作物饲喂动物未显著影响动物的健康。因此,“转基因致癌”是非科学研究的结论,学者和公众有必要回归科学理性的轨道探讨和解决有争议的问题。

英文摘要：

Srralini＇ s ＂GM corn carcinogenic study＂ paper has attracted many concerns and aroused a great controversy in academia and the international community. After recalling the reaction from various communities and analyzing the relevant published literatures, Srralini＇ s research materials, experimental design, data statistics were investigated. The results showed that the materials cannot ensure the uniqueness of its conclusions, and test samples cannot guarantee its conclusions of reproducibility, there can be various interpretations of the results. The results also argued the review system of the journal which hastily published S6ralini＇ s paper. It is one of reasons why Srralini＇ s paper still affects international social controversy over genetically modified crops＇ safety. Furthermore, in which it was cited in the web of science literature, all the study results supported by the experimental data showed that genetically modified crops feeding animals did not significantly affect the health of the animals . Therefore,＂ GMO＇ s carcinogenic＂ is a non-scientific conclusion, It is necessary to discuss and resolve controversial issues for scholars and the general public by scientific rational ways.