中文摘要：

以2010年＂中国科技论文统计源期刊＂,即＂中国科技核心期刊＂作为研究对象,计算学科分类中各期刊之间的互引矩阵。对矩阵的归一化处理,形成了期刊被引用情况的相似性矩阵。利用Pajek绘图软件,绘制中国科技核心期刊分类互引网络示意图。通过对互引网络示意图的分析,识别出星形结构模式、树形机构模式和聚集结构模式等3种基本结构模式,以及多中心模式和总线模式2种复合结构模式。从学科分类角度探索期刊群组互引关系的模式,直观地表现学科分类的特点以及某个期刊与其他期刊的学术交流关系和状态,可以应用在调整期刊分类、监测学科漂移、发现跨学科期刊和支撑编制科技期刊景气指数,还可以应用于防范＂集团非正常互引＂等学术不端行为。

英文摘要：

The Bernal- Polanyi Dispute, which occurred in the late 1930s talking about that science should be planed or to be free, can be traced back to the Second International Conference of History of Science. The Science and Society Movement among scientists throughout the 1930s are the process factors of the dispute. The dispute is actually not between two persons, but between two groups of scientists, in which the magazine Nature played a role in fueling it, and several organizations involved in it. The dispute is far beyond the scope of the United Kingdom. The process of it is a bit twists and turns, and the historical influence of it is far reaching. The controversial questions include the conception of science, the conception of plan and freedom, the mechanism of the development of science, the responsibility of scientists, the social relations of science, etc. It not only sprung up subjects like Science of Science, Sociology of Science, etc, but also promoted researches on Philosophy of Science and History of Science to a new climax. More importantly, this controversy has greatly changed peoples concept of science. It made utilitarian sunk deeper and deeper into people＇s hearts, also it may have contributions to the lalanning of science outside the Soviet Union thereafter.