将马克思历史观的核心内容概括为"历史无主体",这是阿尔都塞对《资本论》最富特色的解读之一。在学界看待阿尔都塞历史无主体论的既有见解中,存在着两个有待检讨的现象:一是普遍未将阿尔都塞的观点归入到整个历史无主体论的大范畴中予以思考;二是一些学者对阿尔都塞的观点采取了"忽视个人能动性"式的隔靴搔痒的批评。因此,正确看待阿尔都塞的历史无主体论,需立足于宽广的哲学史视野、抓住阿尔都塞的真正症结,进而肯定阿尔都塞对《资本论》"社会结构具有支配地位"的科学发现的合理彰显,并揭露其遮蔽《资本论》人类解放学说真实含义的根本局限。
The core of Marx's conception of history is summarized as "history without a subject", which is one of the interpretation of A1 Du Jose on the "capital" of the richest characteristic. In the academic circles about AI Du Jose history without a subject on both views,there are two issues: one is the general phenomenon of not big category of A1 Du Jose view into the history without a subject theory of thinking; two is the number of scholars on AI Du Jose's point of view to "ignore personal initiative". Attempt an ineffective solution criticism. Therefore,a correct view of A1 Du Jose's history without a subject theory,based on the real crux in broad philosophical history, seize the AI Du Jose, then confirm AI Du Jose on "social structure" Das Kapital "dominant" scientific discoveries reveal and expose the reasonable,"Das Kapital" fundamental limitation of the true meaning of human liberation theory.