涡动相关仪在长时间连续观测中,观测数据会有不同程度的缺失。应用6种不同的插补方法(平均昼夜变化法MDV,非线性回归方法NLR,动态线性回归方法DLR,查表法LUT,FAO.PM方法,HANTS方法)对北京密云站2007年涡动相关仪观测蒸散量数据进行了插补。结果表明:LUT方法在不同数据缺失时均得到较好结果(均方差小于8W/m^2);MDV和NLR方法更适合于短时间数据缺失的插补;DLR和FAO—PM方法在观测数据出现连续波动时插补结果较差。由LUT、DLR、NLR、HANTS、FAO—PM方法得到的年蒸散量分别为395.8mm、409.9mm、393.5mm、390.7mm、399.4mm,差异在2.3~19.2mm之间变化。对比分析了LUT方法得到的年蒸散量(潜热通量)与净辐射、降水量以及LAS观测潜热通量间的变化规律,表明插补结果合理。
Data missing is inevitable in long-term eddy covariance system measurement. Several gap filling methods are chosen and applied in the data sets of Miyun station in 2007. These methods include mean diurnal variation (MDV), look-up tables (LUT), nonlinear regressions (NLR), Dynamic linear regression (DLR), Harmonic analysis of time series (HANTS) as well as the method of Penman-Monteith recommend by Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO-PM). The impacts of different gap filling methods on the evapotranspiration are investigated and the results are tested. The result shows: LUT method is stable in every data missing cases (RMSD less than 8 W/m^2 ) ; MDV and NLR methods are more suitable for short data missing ; The gap filling results of DLR and FAO-PM methods are not good if the observed data have large change continuously. The Annual ET obtained by LUT, DLR, NLR, HANTS, FAO-PM methods are 395.8mm, 409.9mm, 393.5mm,390.7mm,399.4mm. The difference between annual ET filled by different methods resulted in a range of 2.3 - 19.2mm per year. The annual ET obtained by LUT method is compared to net radiation, precipitation and latent beat flux measured by LAS; it is shows that the results are reasonable.