本文从终极控制权的角度,以我国2007年-2009年沪深两市连续三年披露了R&D支出的上市公司为样本,从直接产出绩效和会计业绩两方面检验了R&D支出效果。实证研究结果表明:在直接产出绩效方面,R&D投入与专利申请量显著正相关,并且非国有控股上市公司R&D投入的直接产出效应显著大于国有控股上市公司。在会计业绩方面,R&D投入与总资产利润率显著正相关,且存在一个滞后期,滞后期为一到两年,其中非国有控股上市公司R&D投入强度与当期总资产利润率显著正相关,与滞后期总资产利润率不相关;国有控股上市公司R&D投入强度与当期和滞后一期总资产利润率不相关,与滞后二期总资产利润率显著正相关。由此得出结论:非国有企业更关注研发投入的直接产出绩效及当期会计业绩;国有企业则更倾向于能带来中长期会计绩效的研发项目.
tn this paper, from the perspective of ultimate control, we examined the effect of R&D spending in two aspects, that is, direct output pertbrmance and accounting performance, based on data from the listed company disclosed in 2007-2009, we find that, there is a significantly positive correlation between R&D intensity and patent applications, and the positive effect of R&D intensity on patent applications is significantly stronger in non-state-owned enterprises (NSOEs) than state-owned enterprises (SOEs). We also find that, there is a significantly positive correlation between R&D intensity and return on assets (ROA) as well as a lag effect of one or two years. In detail, R&D intensity in NSOEs is significantly positive-correlated with current ROA but non-correlated with that in years followed, while SOEs is opposite, which means a significantly positive correlation between R&D intensity and two-year-delayed ROA but no correlation with the current and one-year-delayed ROAs. We conclude that NSOEs focus more on direct output of R&D input and current accounting performance, while SOEs tend to pursue those that could promote medium or long-term accounting performance