位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
走低碳发展之路:中国碳税政策的设计及CGE模型分析
  • 期刊名称:金融研究
  • 时间:0
  • 页码:19-29
  • 语言:中文
  • 分类:C68[社会学] D58[政治法律—政治学;政治法律—国际政治]
  • 作者机构:[1]清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084
  • 相关基金:本研究得到国家自然科学基金(项目编号70803026)、清华大学低碳经济研究院-低碳经济课题(L08E01)的资助,以及清华财政税收研究所对本文的项目支持. 作者感谢匿名审稿人的意见,当然文责自负.
  • 相关项目:全球化背景下中国环境税改革的政策选择及影响分析: 基于中国动态CGE模型与GTAP国际模型的联结模型分析
作者: 曹静|
中文摘要:

应对气候变化,中国需要走可持续发展的“低碳之路”,这就需要实施政治上可行、经济上有效的环境经济政策。本文根据环境经济学的基本理论结合中国国情,探讨了基于污染量控制的排污权交易与基于价格变化的碳税机制的优缺点,得出碳税政策更适合当前中国国情的结论,并对碳税设计中的税基、税率设定与动态调整、中性税收条件下税收返还、减排激励与补贴以及碳税对居民影响及分配公平等问题展开了讨论。然后,本文基于2005年的社会核算矩阵对中国近期实施碳税政策进行了系统的动态CGE模型分析。

英文摘要:

It is necessary for China to implement politically feasible, economically efficient instruments to combat with global climate change and shift to a low-carbon development pathway. In this paper, the author applies basic environmental economics theory to compare quantity-based cap-and-trade and price-based carbon tax policy, and conclude that carbon tax is more appropriate for China in the near term. The author also discusses various designing factors for carbon tax reform in China, including tax base, tax rate and dynamic adjustment, revenue recycling, abatement incentives and subsidies and likely tax incidences and distribution impacts. Then based on China's 2005 Social Accounting Matrix, the paper uses a recursive dynamic CGE model to analyze the likely impacts of carbon tax on both economy and environment in China. The model simulations suggest that, carbon tax can effectively internalize carbon externality, and bring substantial co-benefits in terms of reducing traditional local pollutants and associated health damages, meanwhile the negative impacts on the economy can be restricted with appropriate tax rate regime. Furthermore, we also compare the welfare impact of carbon tax under two different revenue-neutral recycling regimes. The paper finds that if carbon tax revenue is recycled through lump-sum transfer to the households, though consumption will increase due to the cash incentives, the overall negative impact on the economy is larger. On the contrary, if carbon tax revenue is recycled through rebating other more distorted taxes in the second-best world, overall tax distortions can be reduced thus less negative impacts on the economy, but environmental benefits are slightly lower than the previous case.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文