波特假说认为环境规制给产业造成的负担能够通过技术创新加以弥补从而提高产业绩效。为验证波特假说的存在性,笔者采用2002年~2008年江西省重点调查行业面板数据,考察环境政策规制的产业竞争能力、创新能力和环保能力绩效。实证表明,市场型污染排放征税政策满足波特假说,而行政命令型环境治理建设项目“三同时”政策不满足波特假说;污染排放征税关于产品销售率、流动资产周转率、专利批准量的弹性分别为1.33、0.26、0.97,关于废水、废气、SO2、烟尘排放强度的弹性分别为-1.47、-1.21、-1.37、-2.96,关于电力、柴油、总能源消耗强度的弹性分别为-1.26、-1.58、-1.93。
Porter hypothesis argues that the burden of environment regulation on industry can be made up by technology innovation, thus enhancing the industrial performance. To retest Porter hypothesis, this paper empirically tests on industrial competitiveness, innovation capacity and environment protection capability of environmental policy regulation with 2001-2008 panel data of Jiangxi. It is found that pollution tax policy, being the representative of market environmental policy, satisfies Porter hypothesis, while environment construc- tion policy, being the representative of administrative policy, does not satisfy it. Furthermore, by measurement and comparison of per- formance elastic of environmental policies. It is proved that market environmental policy is easier to meet " Porter hypothesis" than ad- ministrative one.