中文摘要：

当一个全球移动模式在高对比的静止或慢慢地动人的刺激上被附加时，刺激能作为为几秒的时期或者消失并且重现被察觉。这视觉虚幻的现象在最近的文学被称为“导致运动的盲目(MIB ) ”。到目前为止 MIB 的机制上没有一致，特别在在这现象的注意的角色上。在 MIB 上检验空间注意的效果，现在的学习由要求他们对同时在双边的视觉领域(分歧注意条件) 里介绍的二个目标作出回应或仅仅对他们之一作出回应操作了参加者的空间注意(fo-cused-attention 条件) 。一个中央箭头表现为内长的暗示索引在焦点注意的视觉地调节的目标，当一个点处于分歧注意条件相反被介绍时。积累的看不见时期的百分比为在焦点注意的目标是更大的结果表演处于分歧注意条件比为那些调节。注意的这效果在上面的视觉地(UVF ) 和左更低的视觉地(左 LVF ) 里是重要的；也就是说，这效果在 LVF 然而并非在 UVF 显示出半球的不对称现象。而且，积累的看不见时期的百分比比为在处于焦点注意条件的正确 LVF 的那些为在左 LVF 的目标是更大的，但是没有半球的不对称现象处于分歧注意条件被发现。 Inaddition ，当消失更经常发生了并且更长持续了每出现时，处于焦点注意条件的积累的看不见时期的增加的百分比在 LVF 在消失的吝啬的阶段持续时间的改进仅仅发源，它在全部的看不见时期导致了增加，在里面集中--比在 UVF 的分歧注意状况。这些结果建议 MIB 上的空间注意的调整在 UVF 和 LVF 有不同模式。

英文摘要：

When a global moving pattern is superimposed on high-contrast stationary or slowly moving stimuli, the stimuli can be perceived as disappearing and reappearing alternately for periods of several seconds. This visual illusory phenomenon was named ＂motion-induced blindness＂ （MIB） in recent literature. So far there is no consensus on the mechanism of MIB, especially on the role of attention in this phenomenon. To examine the effect of spatial attention on MIB, the present study manipulated the participants＇ spatial attention by asking them to respond to two targets simultaneously presented in bilateral visual fields （the divided-attention condition） or only respond to one of them （the fo- cused-attention condition）. A central arrow was presented as an endogenous cue to index the target visual field in the focused-attention condition, while a point was presented instead in the divided-attenUon condition. The results show that the percentage of accumulated invisibility period was larger for the targets in the focused-attention condition than for those in the divided-attention condition. This effect of attention is significant in upper visual field （UVF） and left lower visual field （left LVF）; that is, this effect shows a hemispheric asymmetry in LVF but not in UVF. Furthermore, the percentage of accumulated invisibility period was larger for targets in left LVF than for those in right LVF in the focused-attention condition, but no hemispheric asymmetry was found in the divided-attention condition. In addition, the increased percentage of accumulated invisibility period in the focused-attention condition originated merely in the enhancement of the mean phase duration of disappearance in LVF, while the disappearance occurred more frequently and lasted longer for each occurrence, which led to an increase in the total invisibility period, in the focused- than divided-attention condition in UVF. These results suggest that the modulation of spatial attention on MIB has different patterns in UVF and