位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
自发走神和有意走神及其与元认知的关系
  • ISSN号:1671-6981
  • 期刊名称:《心理科学》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:G442[哲学宗教—心理学;哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学;文化科学—教育学;文化科学—教育技术学]
  • 作者机构:[1]中国政法大学社会学院,北京100088, [2]山东师范大学心理学院,济南250014
  • 相关基金:本研究得到全国教育科学“十二五”规划课胚一般项目(BBA150049)的资助.
中文摘要:

走神包括有意走神和自发走神两种类型,元认知对二者的影响可能不同。研究使用两维度走神量表和元认知-30量表,对国内部分高校学生的走神和元认知(元认知信念、元认知加工和认知自信判断)进行调查,结果显示:(1)走神可以划分为有意走神和自发走神;(2)失控和危险感既能预测自发走神也能预测有意走神,但认知自信只能预测自发走神,认知的自我意识只能预测有意走神。说明元认知对自发走神和有意走神的影响存在差异。

英文摘要:

Recent research has demonstrated that mind wandering can be subdivided into spontaneous and deliberate types. The former involves a spontaneous, involuntary and uncontrollable process, and the latter is often characterized as a deliberate, intentional and controllable process. According to the standard view of interaction between mind wandering and metacognition, metacognition serves to correct the wandering mind, suppressing spontaneous thoughts and bringing attention back to more "worthwhile" tasks. This view is based on the state level. However, to date, no attempt has been made to evaluate the relationship between metacognition and these subtypes of mind wandering at the trait level. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of metacognition on spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering. A survey was conducted online by a total sample of 183 college students. They completed two questionnaires. One was the Mind Wandering Scale, which consisted of a Deliberate Mind Wandering Scale (MW-D) and a Spontaneous Mind Wandering Scale (MW-S). The other scale was the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), which was based on the longer original version of the same instrument. The MCQ-30 measured participants' beliefs about thinking and thinking processes on five subscales (positive beliefs, uncontTollability and danger, cognitive confidence, needs to control thoughts, and cognitive self-consciousness). A confirmatory factor analysis was calculated to test the common method variance. Results indicated that the single- factor model was not suitable, confirming the study was accurate enough in terms of common method variance. The results showed (1) The confirmatory factor analysis yielded a two-component solution, indicating that the two factors of mind wandering were best captured by a distinction between spontaneous mind wandering and deliberate and willful mind wandering. (2) Metacognition was positively correlated with MW-D and MW-S. The two factors of metacognition (cognitive

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《心理科学》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:中国科学技术学会
  • 主办单位:中国心理学会
  • 主编:李其维
  • 地址:上海市中山北路3663号
  • 邮编:200062
  • 邮箱:xinlikexue@vip.163.com
  • 电话:021-62232236
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1671-6981
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:31-1582/B
  • 邮发代号:4-317
  • 获奖情况:
  • 为国务院学位办审定为核心期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 中国中国人文社科核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国社科基金资助期刊,中国国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库,中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:46796