中文摘要：

本文利用1992～2014年的数据对中美服务贸易的本地市场效应进行了实证检验,发现本地市场效应和劳动力要素禀赋均促进了中国对美国的服务出口,后者小于前者;运输服务和旅游服务、教育服务、金融服务、保险服务、电信服务、广告服务、研发与测试服务及建筑工程咨询服务的本地市场效应显著,计算机与信息服务的本地市场效应没有通过显著性检验,专利权与特许费、管理、咨询与公共关系服务、法律服务、设备的安装、维护与修理服务不存在本地市场效应。因此,一些传统服务贸易行业存在本地市场效应,一些新兴服务贸易行业也存在本地市场效应,说明可以通过发挥本地市场效应来扩大中国对美国服务出口,扭转服务贸易逆差,优化服务贸易结构。

英文摘要：

Using the data from 1992 to 2014 to empirically study the home market effect of Sino-American services trade and various industries, the paper finds that the home market effect and the traditional comparative advantage with labor force factor endowment have promoted service exports from China to the United States, but the promoting effect of the home market effect is larger than the promoting effect of the traditional comparative, transport services, tourism services, education services, financial services, insurance services, telecommunications services, advertising services, research, development and testing services, construction, architectural and engineering services have significant home market effect. The home market effect of computer and information services is not significant. Royalties and license fees, management, consulting, and public relations services, legal services, installation, maintenance, and repair of equipment services do not have home market effect. Therefore, some of the traditional service sectors have local market effect. Some emerging services trade industries also have local market effect. We can use local market effect to expand its service exports to the United States, reverse the services trade deficit, and optimize the structure of services trade.