位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
COORDINATION OF A FASHION AND TEXTILE SUPPLY CHAIN WITH DEMAND VARIATIONS
  • ISSN号:1004-3756
  • 期刊名称:《系统科学与系统工程学报:英文版》
  • 分类:TS101.8[轻工技术与工程—纺织工程;轻工技术与工程—纺织科学与工程] TP391.9[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术;自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]
  • 作者机构:[1]School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China, [2]Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI53201-0413, USA
  • 相关基金:This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 70901068, 71271198), the Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71110107024) and Chinese Universities Scientific Fund. Qinglong Gou would also like to acknowledge the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71121061) for supporting his research. Thank you to the anonymous referees for the valuable comments and advice.
中文摘要:

由于变化时尚趋势和一种不稳定的市场状况,以时尚和纺织品(英尺) 工业要求在一短时间完全是无法预言的并且能变化并且变化,它使协调英尺供应链更困难。在产品偏爱的一个变化由于时尚趋势是英尺工业的需求比另外的工业显示出更多的变化的主要原因。在这份报纸,我们使用一个众所周知的合同,所有单位数量折扣政策(AQDP ) ,供应协调英尺与某些需求锁住,并且我们进一步在需求变化情形下面认为它调查它是否能仍然协调供应链。在卖的季节前,详细, AQDP 被制造商提供给零售商,并且在哪个下面与某个需求完成的英尺供应链协作。在卖的季节期间,需求变化在因此,制造商可以需要修订原来的 AQDP 保险供应的趋势锁住的时尚的一个突然的变化以后被认识到仍然被协调。利用机制设计理论,我们证明那:(i) 当传统的 AQDP 能协调供应时,当时,锁住没有需求变化,它不能总是在需求变化以后协调供应链;(ii ) 当 AQDP 失败时,我们能使用建议使能够的线性定价政策(CLPP ) 完成新协作;(iii ) 一个更主导的决定制造者,能设置一个更高的利润目标,对在需求变化下面的供应链系统的稳定有利。数字例子也被建议显示出我们的结果。

英文摘要:

Owing to the changing fashion trends and a volatile market situation, demand in fashion and textile (FT) industry is unpredictable and could vary and change completely in a short time, which makes it more difficult to coordinate a FT supply chain. A change in product preference due to fashion trends is the main reason why the demand of FT industry shows more variations than other industries. In this paper, we use a well known contract, the all-unit quantity discount policy (AQDP), to coordinate a FT supply chain with certain demand, and we further consider it under the demand variations scenario to investigate whether it can still coordinate the supply chain. In detail, before the selling season, an AQDP is provided by the manufacturer to the retailer, and under which the FT supply chain coordination achieved with a certain demand. During the selling season, demand variation is realized after an abrupt changing of fashion trends, therefore, the manufacturer may need to revise the original AQDP to insure the supply chain is still coordinated. Utilizing the mechanism design theory, we prove that: (i) while the traditional AQDP can coordinate the supply chain when no demand variations, it cannot always coordinate the supply chain after the demand variations; (ii) when the AQDP fails, we can use the proposed capacitated linear pricing policy (CLPP) to achieve a new coordination; (iii) a more dominant decision maker, who can set a higher profit goal, is favorable to stabilization of the supply chain system under demand variations. Numerical examples are proposed also to show our results.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《系统科学与系统工程学报:英文版》
  • 主管单位:
  • 主办单位:中国科学院系统科学研究所
  • 主编:
  • 地址:清华大学经济与管理学院
  • 邮编:100084
  • 邮箱:jchen@tsinghua.edu.cn
  • 电话:010-62771663
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1004-3756
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-2983/N
  • 邮发代号:80-221
  • 获奖情况:
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 俄罗斯文摘杂志,荷兰文摘与引文数据库,美国工程索引,美国科学引文索引(扩展库),英国科学文摘数据库
  • 被引量:56