运用《专业适应性量表》和《学习自我效能感问卷》,对600名高师生进行调查,研究结果是:(1)高师生专业适应性略高于平均水平,但并未达到理想状况。(2)专业承诺与专业自我效能感因子在性别上存在显著差异;专业适应性及其各个因子在年级上存在显著差异;专业承诺与专业自我效能感因子及专业适应性总体水平在科类上存在显著差异;非独生子女的专业适应性及其专业承诺、专业学习动力、专业自我效能水平显著高于独生子女的水平:担任过班干部的高师生的专业承诺、专业学习行为、专业自我效能感水平显著高于未担任过班干部的高师生。(3)高师生专业适应性及其各个因子与学习自我效能感及其各个因子均存在显著正相关,高师生的专业适应性能解释学习自我效能感54.2%的方差变异。
Methods by using professional adaptability scale and learning self-efficacy questionnaire, a cluster sample of 600 normal college students were investigated. The main results are as following: (1) Normal college students professional adaptability is slightly higher than the average level. (2) Professional commitment and professional self-efficacy factor exist significant difference in sex. Professional adaptability and each factor has significant difference in grade, and the adaptation level with the grade rising and declining trend. Professional commitment, professional self-efficacy and professional adaptability has significant difference the subject. Served as class cadres" professional commitment, professional, professional learning behavior self -efficacy level was significantly higher than that without served as class cadres. (3) Normal college students" professional adaptability and its various factors and learning self-efficacy and its various factors were significantly positively related. Professional adaptability can explain variance 54.2% of learning self-efficacy.