中文摘要：

2010年5月～2011年5月,利用自组装气相色谱-质谱联用法（GC-MS）和气相色谱-电子捕获检测法（GC-ECD）在线观测系统,在北京上甸子区域大气本底站开展了二氟一氯乙烷（HCFC-142b）在线观测对比实验,GC-MS和GC-ECD系统分析精度分别为0.23%和0.88%.观测期间HCFC-142b浓度变化范围约为21×10-12～355×10-12;通过独立样本T检验P〉0.05,表明两种方法获得的HCFC-142b浓度数据无显著性差异;对两套系统观测浓度数据的差值分析表明,造成两套系统观测浓度间微小差别的主要因素是空气样品时间分辨率和观测精度.利用局部近似回归法进行本底值筛分,GC-MS和GC-ECD法获得的本底浓度均值差、中值差、25和75百分位数值差均优于系统观测精度.两种方法捕获HCFC-142b污染过程一致,污染浓度均具有夏秋高冬低的特点;两种方法观测HCFC-142b污染浓度的年变化趋势一致.

英文摘要：

Custom-made GC-MS and GC-ECD in-situ measurement systems were established at the Shangdianzi GAW Regional station.From May 2010 to May 2011,the precisions for GC-MS and GC-ECD systems were 0.23% and 0.88%,respectively,and the HCFC-142b mole fraction during the observation period ranged from 21×10^-12 to 355×10^-12.The result of the independent-sample T test was P0.05,and there was no significant difference in HCFC-142b mole fraction measured by the two systems.The small difference of HCFC-142b mole fraction measured by GC-MS and GC-ECD might be associated with the different sampling time and precision of the two systems.A statistical filter of ＂robust local regression＂ was applied to separate HCFC-142b background and pollution data.The mean difference,median difference,25 and 75 percent difference of background data measured by GC-MS and GC-ECD were all within the precisions.The pollution events captured by the two systems showed similar characters.Results from both systems showed a higher HCFC-142b level in summer and autumn than in winter.The pollution mole fraction of the two systems showed similar seasonal changes.