中文摘要：

文章从中国城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间界定出发,基于国土空间开发适宜性评价、主体功能区划、资源环境承载状态评价及其相互交叉分析,对城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间结构进行解析。通过分析城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的国土空间开发适宜程度、主体功能定位、资源环境承载状态的数量结构、空间形态结构以及成因分析,并结合与国家层面相应结构的比较研究,给出了中国城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间格局特征。研究表明：自然岸线格局区域的人均GDP、人口密度、国土开发强度、城市化比重等指标都远高于城市化格局区域,是＂四大格局＂中全国经济和人口集聚程度最高的区域。城市化格局首选开发适宜度高的区域,而农业发展格局和生态安全格局具有明显保护指向性,其大部分区域为适宜度低的区域。城市化格局、农业发展格局、生态安全格局和自然岸线格局的资源环境超载状况均较为严重。

英文摘要：

From the perspectives of the spatial scope definition of urbanization, agricultural development, ecological security, and natural coastline in China, this paper analytically explores the spatial pattern of urbanization, agricultural development, ecological security, and natural coastline, on the basis of crosstab analysis of spatial development suitability, Major Function-Oriented Zoning（MFOZ）and the evaluation of resources and environment carrying capacity. It further concludes the spatial features of the above four patterns through the analysis of quantitative structure, spatial pattern and causes of their resources and environment carrying capacity, spatial development suitability and MFOZ, in conjunction with the comparative study with counterpart structures at national level. The research demonstrates： regions of natural coastline pattern considerably surpass those of urbanization pattern in the indicator-wise, such as percapita GDP, population density, land development intensity, urbanization proportion and alike, which indicates the characteristic of ＂T shaped＂ spatial structure is conspicuous in national level. Beyond that, this pattern group tops all the other three in the sense of regional economic and demographic concentration degree, where the aggregation will further continue in the future. As a result, these regions develop as the preferred priority to build megalopolis, and as the leading regions to help promote national competitiveness and to participate in the global competition. Urbanization pattern prefers priority to the regions hold the high level of development suitability, while the agricultural development and ecological security patterns are apparently more targeted at protection issues, where most of the regions bears a low level of development suitability. Specifically speaking, the ecological security pattern reflects the most significant directivity, as almost 95 percent of its total land is less suitable for development, versus half of the regions of agricultural developmen