中文摘要：

目的：建立一套情绪障碍研究用汉语情绪词分类系统，为异常情绪的研究提供标准化刺激材料。方法：54名不同受教育程度的被试对344个双字汉语情绪词（包括115个正性词、114个负性词、115个中性词）的愉悦度、唤醒度和熟悉度三个维度进行9级的情绪等级评定。结果：三类词语在三个维度上的ANOVA结果显示，分别存在愉悦度主效应（F=2514．96，P=0．000）、唤醒度主效应（F=147．43，P=0．000）和熟悉度主效应（F=106．81，P=0．000）。两两比较后发现正性词的愉悦度得分（7．29±0．41）高于负性和中性词（2．81±0．30、5．47±0．66），中性词得分高于负性词；正性词的唤醒度得分（6．57±0．39）高于负性词和中性词（5．33±0．41、5．23±0．67）；正性词的熟悉度得分（5．98±0．57）高于负性和中性词（4．63±0．53、5．21±0．93），中性词得分高于负性词。结论：初步建立的情绪障碍研究用汉语情绪词分类系统较好，为以后的异常情绪的研究提供词语刺激材料。

英文摘要：

Objective： To establish the Chinese effective words categorize system used in research of emotional disorder, and offer standard material for study of abnormal emotion. Methods： Fifty-four subjects in different levels of education were collected to rate the valence, arousal and familiarity by self-report in a 9-point rating scale for 344 Chinese two-character effective words. Results： According to analysis of variance there were main effects in the valence （ F = 2514. 96, P = 0. 000）, arousal （ F = 147.43, P = 0. 000 ） and familiarity （ F = 106. 81, P = 0. 000 ） respectively. The average valence score of positive words （ 7. 29 ± 0. 41 ） was higher than that of negative words and neutral words, and the average valence score of neutral words （5.47 ±0. 66} was higher than that of negative words （2. 81 ±0. 30） ; the average arousal score of positive words （6. 57 ± 0. 39 ） was higher than that of negative words （ 5. 33 ± 0. 41 ） and neutral words （5.23 ± 0. 67 ） ; the average familiarity score of positive words （ 5.98 ± 0. 57） was higher than that of negative words and neutral words, and the average familiarity score of neutral words （5.21 ± 0. 93 ） was higher than that of negative words （4. 63 ± 0. 53 ） . Conclusion： The Chinese affective words system used in research of emotional disorder is established well, and provides material of word for further study of abnormal emotion.