中文摘要：

Phylobetadiversity 与一个种系发生的观点为社区的生态的类似合并种系发生的信息和贝它差异，和罐头报道。尽管不同 phylobetadiversity 索引在在社区之间的不同特征反映差别，不同 phylobetadiversity 索引的结果不是可比较的。在这研究，我们在 Gutianshan 国家自然保护区为一个 24-hm2 阴谋检验了 phylobetadiversity 索引。它被发现丰富加权的 D pw 与 Raos 二次的熵的 Raos D 几乎相同。PhyloSor 有一个类似的生态的意思和算法到 UniFrac。尽管 D nn 在从 UniFrac 和 PhyloSor 的定义是不同的，他们都强烈被相关。当规模是相对小的时， phylobetadiversity 上的种类丰富的效果不是重要的，但是是重要的更逍遥法外规模。当规模增加了，这些对比多半在社区从减小导致了平均。P 圣和 Raos H 更好反映了变化引起了由的距离腐烂空间并且产地变化比更全体的另外的索引可伸缩，而 AW-D nn 和 D nn 更好在小规模反映了这些变化。

英文摘要：

Phylobetadiversity incorporates phylogenetic information and beta diversity, and can account for the ecological similarities between communities with a phylogenetic perspective. Although different phylobetadiversity indices reflect differences in different characteristics between communities, the results of different phylobetadiversity indices are not comparable. In this study we examined phylobetadiversity indices for a 24-hm2 plot in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. It was found the abundanceweighted Dpw was almost identical to Rao＇s D of Rao＇s quadratic entropy. PhyloSor had a similar ecological meaning and algo- rithm to UniFrac. Although Dnn was different in definition from UniFrac and PhyloSor, they were all strongly correlated. The effect of species abundance on phylobetadiversity was not significant when scales were relatively small, but was significant at larger scales. These contrasts likely resulted from reductions in evenness in communities as scales increased. PST and Rao＇s H better reflected the distance-decay changes caused by spatial and habitat variation than other indices at larger scales, whereas AW-Dnn and Dnn better reflected these changes at small scales.