欢迎您！东篱公司
退出
-
申报数据库
-
立项数据库
-
成果数据库
-
项目获奖数据库
中文摘要：
诉讼证明标准是证据制度的核心内容，长久以来，基于种种原因，我国采用的是“案件事实清楚，证据确实、充分”绝对确定的一元化诉讼证明标准，然而这一诉讼证明标准曲解了辩证唯物主义的认识论、无视三大诉讼以及相关诉讼证据制度的特点，有碍程序自身伦理价值的实现，同时又与法治国家的司法实践相左。绝对确定的一元化诉讼证明标准存在缺陷，因此一元化证明标准必然向多元化证明标准进行转变。
英文摘要：
Standards of Proof in Litigation lie in the core of the proof system. Traditionally, the absolute determinacy of the centralized proof standards in litigation ＂that the case facts are clear and the proof is definite and full＂ has been adopted in China for various reasons. However, this mis-interpreters the epistemology of dialectical materialism and ignores the characteristics of the proof system of three greatest and related litigations. As a result, it is a hindrance to the realization of self-procedure of ethics values, and meanwhile, it goes against the judicatory practice of law-ruled countries. It is obvious that some blemishes do exist in the absolute determinacy of the centralized proof standards in litigation; therefore, the diversified proof standards will unavoidably replace the centralized proof standards.
同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
位置：