科技类评审中,如何合理地选择出若干优秀项目加以资助或激励至关重要。本文研究了科技类评审中的项目选择问题,指出在目前通行的两阶段评议法中存在通讯评议阶段的决策信息不能有效传递到会议评议阶段的情况,应采用适当的方法将两个阶段专家给出的评价信息进行综合处理,以得到更为合理的项目评审结果,进而给出了两阶段综合集成的框架与具体方法。算例表明,可以更充分的利用两阶段的专家评价信息,得到满意的选择结果。
For any project review,selecting projects to be sponsored or awarded rationally is an important task in the science and technology project management.The purpose of this paper is to explore how to improve two-stage review process of project in the context of science and technology project review in China.Firstly,the results of two-stage review process is analyzed in detail,and it shows that there exist some contradicts between correspondent review and session review,due to the missing of decision-making information.Then,using the decision-making theoretic framework,the proposal selection problem in science and technology project review is modeled as a two-stage integration evaluation model.In this model,decisions are made through the integration of different experts' evaluation information at two stages including correspondent review and meeting review.Finally,a numerical example is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.