中文摘要：

目的将为击的处理评估 Danqipiantan 囊(DPC ) 的功效和安全。方法 PubMed，中国科技杂志数据库， Wanfang 数据库，在中国知识基础结构的中国期刊，和天津医药大学的图书馆的医院将军被寻找直到 2012 年 7 月。使随机化的控制试用(RCT ) 和报导为击的处理的 DPC 的使用被选择的观察研究。结果包括了 12 RCT 的十一篇文章，和包括了 3 观察研究的 2 篇文章被识别。2590 个病人的一个总数参予了研究。我们发现以有效的率 DPC 治疗组和控制组之间有重要统计差别[风险比率(RR ) ， 1.14；95% 信心间隔(CI ) ， 1.04， 1.25；P=0.01 ] ， Fugl-Meyer 评价规模[加权的吝啬的差别(WMD ) ， 9.77；95% CI (4.84， 14.70 ) ；P=0.00 ] ， Barthel 索引[WMD=6.40；95% CI (3.15， 9.65 )] ，并且吝啬的流动速度[WMD= 5.79；95% CI (1.64， 9.94 )] 。为健康中风规模的国家研究所没有重要差别[WMD=0.60；95% CI (1.09， 2.29 )] ，视觉领域缺点[左视觉地：WMD= 203.10；95% CI (424.41， 18.21 ) ；恰好视觉的地：WMD= 172.60；95% CI (409.29， 64.09 )] 或功能的独立措施[WMD= 7.90；95% CI (16.64， 0.84 )] 。包括了八 RCT 的七篇文章报导了 DPC 治疗的安全。包括了三观察研究的二篇文章也为 DPC 报导了有益的效果。因为中国研究具有样品的差的方法学的质量，和大多数，尺寸是小的，我们的分析被偏爱多半影响。结论 DPC 有有益的效果并且当为击的处理使用了时，是相对安全的。

英文摘要：

OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Danqipiantan capsule （DPC） for the treatment of stroke. METHODS： PubMed, China Science And Technolo- gy Journal Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese periodicals in the China National Knowledge Infra- structure, and the General Hospital of Tianjin Medi- cal University＇s Library were searched until July 2012. Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） and ob- servational studies that reported the use of DPC for treatment of stroke were selected. RESULTS： Eleven articles that included 12 RCTs, and 2 articles that included 3 observational studies were identified. A total of 2590 patients participat- ed in the studies. We found that there was a signifi-cant statistical difference between DPC treatment groups and the control groups in terms of the effec- tive rate [risk ratio （RR）, 1.14; 95% confidence inter- vals （CI）, 1.04, 1.25; P=0.01], FugI-Meyer Assessment Scale [weighted mean difference （WMD）, 9.77; 95% CI （4.84, 14.70）; P=0.00], Barthel Index [WMD=6.40; 95% CI （3.15, 9.65）], and mean flow velocity [WMD= 5.79; 95% CI （1.64, 9.94）]. There were no significant differences for The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [WMD=0.60; 95% CI （ - 1.09, 2.29）], vi- sual field defects [left visual field： WMD= - 203.10; 95% CI （ - 424.41, 18.21）; right visual field： WMD= - 172.60; 95% CI （ - 409.29, 64.09）] or the functional independence measure [WMD= - 7.90; 95% CI （ - 16.64, 0.84）]. Seven articles that included eight RCTs reported the safety of DPC treatment. Two ar- ticles that included three observational studies also reported beneficial effects for DPC. Because the Chinese studies were of poor methodological quali- ty, and most of the sample sizes were small, our analysis was likely affected by bias. CONCLUSION： DPC has a beneficial effect and is relatively safe when used for the treatment of stroke.