中文摘要：

目的 探讨急性体液性排斥反应对移植肾预后的影响.方法 共有1098例接受首次尸体肾移植的受者纳入研究.所有受者术后均采用以他克莫司或环孢素A为基础的三联免疫抑制方案,当发生排斥反应时,采用甲泼尼龙冲击治疗,疗效较差者则联合应用莫罗单抗-CD3或丙种球蛋白或行血浆置换进行治疗.术后1年内经病理检查证实,有53例受者发生急性体液性排斥反应（急性体液性排斥反应组）,109例发生急性细胞性排斥反应（急性细胞性排斥反应组）,其余936例受者术后1年内肾功能稳定（对照组）.分析和比较3组受者性别、年龄、术前淋巴毒、HLA抗原错配数、群体反应性抗体（PRA）水平及供肾冷/热缺血时间等冈素间的差异,比较3组受者术后移植肾功能丧失情况及移植肾存活率,分析完全逆转的急性体液性排斥反应与细胞性排斥反应对移植肾预后的影响.结果 3组受者在性别、年龄、术前淋巴细胞毒性试验、供肾冷缺血时间及术后随访时间等方面比较,差异均无统计学意义（P＜0.05）.急性体液性排斥反应组和急性细胞性排斥反应组受者在术前HLA抗原错配数、PRA水平及供肾热缺血时间等方面均明显高于对照组,与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.随访期间,急性体液性排斥反应组受者移植肾功能丧失的发生率为27.4%（14/53）,明显高于急性细胞性排斥反应组的7.3%（8/109）和对照组的2.2%（21/936）,3组间差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01）.通过kaplan-meier生存分析发现,急性体液性排斥反应组受者的移植肾存活率明显低于急性细胞性排斥反应组和对照组（P＜0.01）.剔除发生排斥反应后未逆转者,3组间移植肾存活率的比较,差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 急性体液性排斥反应明显影响移植肾存活,但完全逆转的急性体液排斥反应并不影响移植肾的预后.

英文摘要：

Objective To explore the effect of acute humoral rejection on kidney graft survival.Methods 1098 patients received cadaveric renal transplant from January 2002 to December 2008 in our center. All patients were given triple immunosuppressants including tacrolimus or cyclosporine.According to patients who experienced biopsy-proved humoral rejection and cellular rejection within one year post-transplant, there were 53 cases in humoral rejection group, 109 in cellular rejection group （including 63 patients with borderline change）, and 936 in normal group. Patients who experienced acute rejection received mythyl-prednisolone pulse, or received anti-CD3 antibody/plasma exchange/globulin. Clinical characteristics before operation including sex, age, HLA mismatch, panel reactive antibody, cold/warm ischemic time, graft loss rate and graft survival were compared among three groups. The effect of completely reversed cellular rejection and humoral rejection on graft survival was analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in sex, age and cold ischemic time among three groups, but there was significant difference in warm ischemic time, level of PRA and HLA mismatch between cellular rejection group or humor rejection group and normal group （P＜0. 05）. During a follow-up period, the incidence of graft loss in humoral rejection group was 27.4 %, significantly higher than 7.3 % in cellular rejection group and 2.2 % in normal group, P＜0. 001. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the survival rate of grafts in humoral rejection group was significantly lower than in cellular rejection group and normal group （P＜0.001 ）. After patients with irreversible rejection were excluded,there was no significant difference in the survival rate of grafts among the three groups.Conclusion Patients with acute humoral rejection survived with inferior graft outcome,but completely reversible rejection showed no effect on the graft survival.