中文摘要：

目的 探讨高原军人抑郁、焦虑与情绪调节方式的关系。方法 采用流调中心抑郁自评量表（center for epidemiologic studies depression scale，CES-D）、状态-特质焦虑量表（state-trait anxiety inventory，STAI）、军人情绪调节方式量表（armymen emotion regulation types questionnaire，AERTQ）对4691名高原军人进行抽样调查。结果 ①高原军人抑郁发生率为31.60%，均分为（13.27±7.19）；状态焦虑均分（39.28±8.98），特质焦虑均分（39.28±8.43）。② 4种军人情绪调节方式使用频率差异有统计学意义[F（3,13 890）=1401.99，P〈0.01]，从高到低依次是自我安慰（15.60±4.29）、情感求助（13.82±4.22）、行为抑制（13.45±4.32）、认知重视（11.16±3.98）。③高原军人的抑郁、状态焦虑、特质焦虑都与认知重视（r=0.492、r=0.303、r=0.373，P〈0.01）、行为抑制（r=0.189、r=0.041、r=0.057，P〈0.01）呈正相关，而与情感求助（r=-0.099、r=-0.185、r=-0.161，P〈0.01）、自我安慰（r=-0.150、r=-0.221、r=-0.227，P〈0.01）呈负相关。③认知重视、行为抑制、情感求助、自我安慰能够有效地预测高原军人抑郁情绪，总解释率为29.40%；认知重视、情感求助、自我安慰能够预测高原军人状态焦虑和特质焦虑，总解释率分别为17.00%、22.10%。结论 使用不同军人情绪调节方式对高原军人抑郁、状态焦虑和特质焦虑有重要影响。

英文摘要：

Objective To explore the relationship of emotion regulation types with depression and anxiety in officers and soldiers stationed in high altitude areas. Methods A total of 4 691 officers and soldiers stationed in plateau areas were surveyed with epidemiologic studies depression scale （CES-D）, statetrait anxiety inventory （STAI） and armymen emotion regulation types questionnaire （AERTQ）. Results ① In high altitude areas, the prevalence rate of depression in military personnel was 31.60%. The mean score for depression symptom was 13.27±7.19, that for state anxiety inventory was 39.28±8.98, and for trait anxiety inventory was 39.28±8.43. ②The frequencies of using 4 emotion regulation types were significant different [F（3,13890）=1401.99, P〈0.01], with self-comfort （15.60±4.29）, affective-appeal （13.82±4.22）, behavior-restrain （13.45±4.32）, and cognitive-focus （11.16±3.98） in order. ③The depression, state anxiety and trait anxiety had positive correlation with cognitive-focus （r=0.492, r=0.303, r=0.373, P〈0.01） and behavior-restrain （r=0.189, r=0.041, r=0.057, P〈0.01）, and had negative correlation with affective-appeal （r=-0.099, r=-0.185, r=-0.161, P〈0.01） and self-comfort （r=-0.150, r=-0.221, r=-0.227, P〈0.01）. ④ Cognitivefocus, behavior-estrain, affective-appeal and selfcomfort were predictors of depression, with a total explanation rate of 29.40% for the total variance. Cognitivefocus, affective-appeal and self-comfort were predictors of state anxiety and trait anxiety, which could explain 17.00% and 22.10% respectively of the total variance. Conclusion Different emotion regulation types exert important effect on depression, state anxiety and trait anxiety in officers and soldiers in high altitude.