中文摘要：

基于现状、关系和影响路径视角,笔者梳理了外商研发投资（FRDI）和东道国市场创新绩效相关文献。研究发现：（1）行业层面,在华FRDI依次“偏好”技术密集型、资本密集型和劳动密集型行业,注册类型层面,在华FRDI依次“偏好”中外合资经营类、外商独资类、外商投资股份类和中外合作经营类企业。（2）在华FRDI与东道国市场创新绩效双向互动,东道国和母国的一系列相对特征都会影响作为“促进论”重要诱因的“技术溢出”现象。（3）FRDI会对东道国和母国产生“研发增加”和“研发转移”两种客观效应,两者的权衡导致两国市场创新绩效提升存在“可以并存”和“零和博弈”两种情况。（4）“发达国家/发展中国家流入发达国家”的研发投资会显著/不显著抑制“零和博弈”局面的出现,东道国与母国“研发增加”的现象初显。

英文摘要：

From the perspective of status, relationship and influence path, we study the domestic and foreign literature on Foreign R＆D Investment （FRDI） and the innovation performance in the host coun- try. The study found that ： （ 1 ） Taking China as an example, from industry perspective, the preferred invest- ment sequence of FRDI is to invest in technology intensive industries, capital intensive industries and labor- intensive industries ; from the perspective of registration type, the preferred investment sequence of FRDI is to invest in foreign joint ventures, wholly foreign-owned enterprises, companies limited by shares with foreign investment and Sino-foreign cooperative enterprises. （2） An interactive relationship shown between FRDI and the innovation performance in the host country, and a series of home and host country relative characteris- tics affect the ＂spillover＂ phenomenon, which is an important cause of the ＂promote theory＂. （3） FRDI has two objective effects on both host and home country＇s innovation performance, namely ＂R＆D increment＂ and ＂R＆D transfer＂, which lead to two results called ＂coexist＂ and ＂zero-sum game＂. （4） ＂R＆D investment flows from developed/developing countries into developed countries＂ can significantly/not significantly inhibit the ＂zero-sum game＂ situation of both host and home country＇s innovation performance promotion, mean- while, ＂R＆D increment＂ phenomenon previews.