位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
对辱虐管理与下属公平感关系的再分析:一个有中介的调节效应模型
  • ISSN号:1671-6981
  • 期刊名称:《心理科学》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:F272.92[经济管理—企业管理;经济管理—国民经济]
  • 作者机构:[1]中央财经大学商学院,北京100081, [2]中国人民大学劳动人事学院,北京100872
  • 相关基金:本研究得到国家自然科学基金项目(71302129)、教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(13YJC630176)和北京市自然科学基金项目(9144035)的资助.
中文摘要:

新近研究发现辱虐管理对下属互动公平感的负向影响受下属权力距离调节:对低权力距离下属来说这种影响相对较强,反之较弱。基于社会交换理论,本文对现有研究做了两方面拓展。首先,引入下属针对领导的总体公平感,考察权力距离在辱虐管理与总体公平感之间的调节作用,扩展那些仅关注互动公平感的研究。其次,引入领导一部属交换,解释权力距离具体是如何在辱虐管理与下属总体公平感之间发挥调节作用的。以296名企业员工为被试,研究发现:(1)下属权力距离在辱虐管理与下属总体公平感之间有调节作用;(2)这种调节作用是通过领导一部属交换的中介作用实现的,即对不同权力距离的下属来说,辱虐管理对领导一部属交换有不同作用,进而对下属总体公平感产生不同影响。

英文摘要:

With the increasing attention on the dark side of leadership, abusive supervision has become a prevalent topic of investiga- tion, as it has been linked to a variety of negative outcomes including follower injustice. Recent literature has suggested that power dis- tance moderates the link between abusive supervision and follower perceived justice such that the relationship is stronger for followers lower in power distance. However, the research has focused mostly on follower interactional justice, leaving the phenomenon of how a- busive supervision affects other types of justice uncharted. Researchers have not explored the underlying process through which power distance moderates the correlation of abusive supervision with follower justice. To tackle this problem, the current study contributes to the literature in two important ways. Using social exchange theory as an o- verarehing framework, we first introduce follower supervisor - directed overall justice to examine the moderating role of power distance between abusive supervision and follower justice, extending research that solely investigated interactional justice as outcome. Second, we provide leader - member exchange and test its mediated role between abusive supervision -- follower power distance interaction and follower supervisor - directed overall justice, disentangling the underlying mechanism that power distance moderates abusive supervision - follower justice association. In other words, we explore abusive supervision - follower justice relationship from the perspective of a u- nifying conceptual framework that combines mediating and moderating effects. We examined research questions using a sample of 296 interior designers from a large home furnishing company in China. Measures with adequate reliability and validity were used to capture key variables. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory discriminant validity of the variables and precluded the common method bias. Consistent with the hypothesis, the results suggested the

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《心理科学》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:中国科学技术学会
  • 主办单位:中国心理学会
  • 主编:李其维
  • 地址:上海市中山北路3663号
  • 邮编:200062
  • 邮箱:xinlikexue@vip.163.com
  • 电话:021-62232236
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1671-6981
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:31-1582/B
  • 邮发代号:4-317
  • 获奖情况:
  • 为国务院学位办审定为核心期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 中国中国人文社科核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国社科基金资助期刊,中国国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库,中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:46796