中文摘要：

基于Gable和Harmone．Jones提出的动机维度模型，采用行为的和认知的情绪诱发手段，研究趋近动机强度不同的积极情绪对复合字母刺激心理旋转整体优先效应的影响。实验一采用微笑的面部表情配合三种身体姿势（前倾、挺直和后倚）分别诱发高中低三种趋近动机强度不同的积极情绪；实验二采用金钱激励延迟范式作为情绪诱发手段，增加中性情绪对比条件。结果表明：（1）在后倚和挺直时大字母的反应时均显著短于小字母（p〈0．05），而前倾时大小字母无显著差异（p〉0．05）；（2）奖励（获得／不获得）的主效应不显著Q〉0．05），但是在目标后获得反馈和目标后意外获得反馈两种条件下大字母的反应时显著快于小字母p〈0．05），而目标前获得线索条件下大小字母间反应时差异不显著p〉O．05）。结论：趋近动机强度调节着积极情绪对心理旋转整体优先效应的影响；但是没发现效价（积极情绪／中性情绪）调节心理旋转整体优先效应。

英文摘要：

The Motivational Dimensional Model （MDM, Gable ＆ Harmon-Jones, 2010c）, based on a series of experiments on attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation, proposes that the positive affect high in approach motivation narrows the scope of cognition, whereas the positive affect low in approach motivation broadens the scope of cognition （Gable ＆ Harmon-Jones, 2010b, 2011a; Price ＆ Harmon-Jones, 2010）. The current study examined the influence of positive affects differed in approach motivational intensity on the effect of global precedence on mental rotation of compound stimuli on the basis of MDM hypothesis. We carried out two experiments using behavioral and cognitive emotion-eliciting methods to examine the influence of positive affects differed in the approach motivational intensities on the effect of global precedence on mental rotation of compound stimuli. In Experiment 1 we adopted 3 body postures （leaning forward, sitting upright and reclining backward） accompanied by the facial expression of smile to elicit positive affects with high, moderate and low approach motivation, respectively. In Experiment 2 we adopted Monetary Incentive Delay Paradigm, which added neutral condition lacked in experiment 1. Twenty eight and thirty one university students completed the parity judgment task that requires mental rotation of compound stimuli in each experiment. The first object was to examine the influence of positive affects differed in approach motivation on mental rotation. The second object was to examine the different effect between the positive affect in different approach motivation and the neutral condition on mental rotation. The results were： （1） In Experiment 1 Individuals responded faster to global targets than local targets when sitting upright and reclining forward, while their performance remained in the same level given local and global targets when leaning forward; （2） In Experiment 2 the results showed that the main effect of the reward （gain/no gain） on the RTs of me