中文摘要：

冬小麦是南京地区重要的粮食作物,模拟冬小麦蒸散量(evapotranspiration,ET)并研究其对气象因素的响应可为冬小麦田间水分管理提供参考。该文基于大型称重式蒸渗仪实际测定值分析了冬小麦ET变化规律,分别采用单源模型(Penman-Monteith,PM)和双源模型(Shuttleworth-Wallace,SW)模拟不同时期冬小麦ET,并探讨分时段修正SW模型的模拟方法,在此基础上,分析了ET对气象因素的响应。结果表明,生育初期,冬小麦的ET逐步增加,进入越冬期则逐步降低并保持在较低水平。返青期和拔节期ET迅速增加,开花和成熟期又保持稳定。2011-2012和2013-2014年分时段采用SW模型估算整个生育期冬小麦的蒸散量比整个生育期采用单一估算模型能够减小模拟平均绝对误差0.01~0.04 mm/h。小麦乳熟成熟期采用最小气孔阻力150 s/m计算的修正SW模型可以比整个生育期用单一最小气孔阻力的SW模型降低冬小麦蒸发蒸腾量的估算平均绝对误差0.03~0.13 mm/h。冬小麦蒸发蒸腾量与气象因素密切相关,与净辐射、空气温度和饱和水汽压差等环境因素决定系数顺序为净辐射>饱和水汽压差>空气温度>风速。这表明南京地区冬小麦蒸发蒸腾量主要决定因素为净辐射。该研究能够为冬小麦蒸散量的模拟方法以及田间水分管理提供参考。

英文摘要：

Winter wheat is an important food crop in Nanjing. In order to investigate the water management and increase the yield, it is crucial to investigate the precise water consumption of winter wheat and its influencing factors. Using the data of measured evapotranspiration (ET) with weighing lysimeter and meteorology factors from automatic weather station during 2011-2012 and 2013-2014, we analyzed the seasonal variation of winter wheat ET and simulated the ET using Penman-Monteith (PM) and Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) model in 4 different periods from sowing to harvest in the experiment site of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (118.8 °E, 32.0 °N, with an altitude of 32 m). The site belonged to subtropical monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of 15.6 ℃ and an average annual rainfall of 1 106 mm. The soil was yellow brunisolic soil with a field capacity of 0.30 cm3/cm3. The weighing lysimeter had an effective evapotranspiration area of 4 m2, with an accuracy of 0.1±0.01 mm. Jarvis model was modified to calculate the canopy resistance which was considered as the most sensitive variable in PM and SW models. In addition, we discussed the relationships between ET and environmental factors. The results showed that winter wheat ET increased gradually to 0.25 mm/h in the sowing and tillering stage, kept at a low level of about 0.20 mm/h in the winter period, and increased rapidly in the regreening and shooting period. The peak ET was 1.37 mm/h in April when the canopy was well developed. The PM model was suitable for calculating the ET in developed canopy cover, but the underestimate of the ET occurred in the beginning of the stage and the overestimate of the ET occurred in the end of the growing season. The analysis of modeling ET in sowing-tillering, tillering completion-regreen stage and jointing-filling stage indicated that the SW model performed well with a minimum stomatal resistance of 70 s/m, however, there was still large errors in milky stage. Lower soil water content occurred