中文摘要：

[目的／意义]以SCI眼科学期刊为例，分析JCR最新公布的期刊评价指标影响因子百分位和标准特征因子对期刊的评价效力。[方法／过程]以课题组前期问卷调查的30种SCI收录的美国眼科学期刊为基础，选择其中有SNIP和SJR值的29种期刊作为研究对象，使用Spearman等级秩相关分析影响因子百分位、标准特征因子与问卷调查评分结果的相关性，并与现行使用的期刊评价指标影响因子、特征因子、论文影响分值、SNIP、SJR做对比．以评价新增指标影响因子百分位和标准特征因子对期刊的评价效力。[结果／结论]新增指标和现行使用的期刊评价指标均呈显著正相关（均为P=0．000）。与问卷调查评分也均呈显著正相关（均为P=0．000），相关系数由高到低分别为标准特征因子（0．787）、特征因子（0．787）、SJR（0．667）、SNIP（0．647）、论文影响分值（0．636）、影响因子百分位（0．615）、影响因子（0．593）。在同一学科中，标准特征因子与特征因子对期刊的排序是完全一致的；影响因子百分位与影响因子的相关系数最高，为0．991。影响因子百分位和标准特征因子对期刊学术影响力均有较强的评价效力。

英文摘要：

[ Purposes/Significance ] Making the SCI journal of ophthalmology as an example, analysis the effectiveness of average JIF percentile and normalized Eigenfactor. [ Methods/Process ] Based on 30 kinds American ophthalmology journals, which are the earlier questionnaire survey＇s object of our research group, selected 29 journals with SNIP and SJR as the research objects. Using the Spearman rank correlation analysis to analyze the correlation of average JIF percentile, normalized Eigenfactor and score of questionnaire for journals. And the influence factors, Eigenfactor, article influence score, SNIP, S JR were used to compare the effectiveness of average JIF percentile and normalized Eigenfactor. [ Results/Conelusions] New indicators and the current use of journal evaluation index were significantly posi- tively related （ all P = 0. 000 ）, with questionnaire scores are also has significant positive correlation （ all P = 0.000 ）. The correlation coeffi- cient from high to low to questionnaire scores respectively are normalized Eigenfactor （ 0. 787 ）, Eigenfactor （ 0. 787 ）, S JR （ 0. 667 ）, SNIP （0. 647 ）, article influence score （0.636）, average JIF percentile （0.615 ）, impact factor （0.593）. In the same discipline, order of the journals of the normalized Eigenfactor and Eigenfactor is completely consistent, the correlation coefficient between average JIF percen- tile and influence factor is 0. 991, with the article influence score is 0. 943. The average JIF percentile and normalized Eigenfactor both have strong effectiveness to journal academic impact.