中文摘要：

本文利用湖北省农村地区的调查数据,运用Binary Logistic回归模型分析了农户对农业废弃物资源化生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素及其差异性。研究表明：①73.4%的农户愿意为农业废弃物资源化所带来的生态效益付费;②影响农户支付意愿的关键因素按贡献度大小排序依次为性别、对环境的依赖程度、对农业废弃物资源化有益于人体健康的价值认同、农业收入所占比、对农业废弃物资源化有益于农村发展的价值认同、农业经济规模、对环境状况的评价和环境知识了解程度;③不同性别、不同农业收入所占比、不同环境知识、不同心理感知等限定条件下,影响农户对农业废弃物资源化生态补偿支付意愿的因素具有异质性：男性更加注重农业废弃物资源化对人体健康的影响;对于农业收入所占比＂一般＂的农户,文化程度是影响其支付意愿的关键因素,但这种影响受环境知识水平限制;对环境状况评价＂较好＂的农户更为重视对现有环境的维护。

英文摘要：

The shortage and waste of resources, and environmental pollution have become important factors restricting the sustainable development of agriculture in China. Using survey data from rural areas of Hubei, the a Binary Logistic regression model was applied to analyze farmer willingness to pay ecological compensation for agricultural waste utilization. Nearly three-quarters （73.4%） of respondents were willing to pay the ecological benefits brought by agricultural waste utilization. Among them, 75.5 percent of male-headed households were willing, and 52.8% of female-headed ones were willing. A small number of farmers were not willing to pay, due to economic inability, low level of understanding of the value of agricultural waste utilization, and ecological compensation. The following factors affected willingness （in order of descending influence）： gender, dependence on the environment, and a recognition of the benefits of agricultural waste utilization for human health, agricultural income ratio, recognition of the benefits of agricultural waste utilization on rural development, total amount of agricultural economy,environmental assessment and understanding of environmental knowledge. Significant heterogeneity was found for the factors influencing farmer willingness to, such as for gender,agricultural income ratio, environmental knowledge and psychological perception. For example, male farmers paid more attention to the impact on human health. We conclude that when developing standards in ecological compensation, costing should consider ecological welfare brought by agricultural waste utilization. The government should strengthen the training of the ecological environment to improve farmer willingness to pay ecological compensation for agricultural waste utilization. Last, developing differentiated ecological compensation policies can help improve farmer willingness to pay.