位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
图书供应商的混合型多人多准则多层次评价
  • 期刊名称:图书情报工作
  • 时间:0
  • 页码:92-95
  • 分类:G253.1[文化科学—图书馆学] N945.25[自然科学总论—系统科学]
  • 作者机构:[1]湖南理工学院信息与通信工程学院,岳阳414006, [2]湖州师范学院图书馆,湖州313000, [3]湖南理工学院数学学院,岳阳414006
  • 相关基金:本文系国家自然科学基金项目“基于距离测度的多人多维多元偏好信息集结优化”(项目编号:60904059)、湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“不确定需求下多源多时段供应商选择与采购优化”(项目编号:088030)研究成果之一.
  • 相关项目:基于距离测度的多人多维多元偏好信息集结优化
中文摘要:

针对图书馆图书供应商选择由多个专家根据多个指标进行决策的特点,考虑每个指标下的决策者权重,建立一种混合型多准则多层次群决策模型。首先,对各决策者以数值进行评价的定量指标,用线性加权和法求得决策群体对供应商的排序;然后,对定性指标,以逼近群体理想解法集结各决策者的序数偏好得到供应商的群体排序;最后,考虑各指标权重,用逼近群体理想解法求得供应商的最终排序结果,并以算例说明本方法的应用。本研究考虑多种偏好形式同时存在且具有多级指标的情形,定性与定量结合,为供应商选择提供群决策方法支持,可提高其科学性和有效性。

英文摘要:

A hybrid muhi -criteria multi -level group decision - making model considering the weights of decision makers with re- spect to each criteria was developed for books supplier selection which is usually made by muhiple experts according to multiple crite- ria. At first, the rankings of the alternatives for the group under quantitative criteria were derived from the digital evaluation by linear weighted sum method. Then, the ones under qualitative criteria were calculated by the technique for order preference by similarity to group ideal solution (TOPSGIS). At last, the final ranking of the alternatives for the group were obtained by TOPSGIS again after the criteria weights were considered. The method was illustrated by an example. This proposed method combines qualitative and quantita- tive analysis to deal with both cardinal and ordinal data and multi - level indexes, and it provides group decision - making methodology for books supplier selection and thus can improve its seientificity and validity.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文