中文摘要：

文章以h指数、学术迹、影响矩等文献计量指标作为学术化评价指标，用补充计量指标（Altmetric indicators）作为社会化评价指标，对应用物理学、环境科学、经济学、历史学四个学科的各60篇单篇论著的评价效果进行综合比较研究。结果表明各评价指标均具有独立意义。在揭示h指数、学术迹、影响矩等学术化评价指标之间存在显著相关性的同时，发现社会化评价指标与学术化评价指标之间没有显著相关性，不可能用补充计量指标替代学术评价指标。

英文摘要：

Applying h-index, academic trace and impact torque as academic indicators, Altmetric score as social indica-tors, comparative studies were done with 240 articles, 60 from each of the four fields of physics applied, environmental sciences, economics, and history. The results show that each indicator has its independent meaning. There are obvious correlations among h-index, academic trace and impact torque, but no obvious correlation between academic indicators and altmetric indicators is found, so it is impossible to substitute academic indicators by altmetric indicators.