目的探讨内皮素家族(ET)对恶性黑素瘤(MM)A375细胞转化生长因子betal(TGF—β1)表达的差异性调节及对TGF—β信号通路蛋白Smad 3磷酸化水平的影响。方法ELISA、RT—PCR技术测定不同浓度ET-1、ET-3(0、0.1、1、10、100nmol/L)及其与内皮素受体阻断剂BQ123、BQ788联合干预下MM细胞TGF—β1在蛋白质和mRNA水平的表达。Western印迹法检测联合干预下A375细胞Smad 3蛋白磷酸化的表达。结果ET-1对A375细胞(10^5细胞)TGF—β1蛋白表达的影响呈浓度依赖性上调,100nmol/L浓度下达1289.38±89.42ng/L(P〈0.05);ET-3的作用与此相反,100nmol/L浓度下表达仅为85.09±9.37ng/L(P〈0.05)。BQ123明显阻断ET-1上调TGF—β1的效应(P〈0.05),BQ788对此差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);联合干预下,在TGF—β1 mRNA水平也表现出相同的趋势。Western印迹法检测磷酸化Smad3蛋白(P—Smad3)表达显示,ET-1显著上调P—Smad3的表达(P〈0.05),BQ123干预下其表达水平接近对照组(P〉0.05),BQ788不能阻断其对P—Smad3表达的上调(P〉0.05);ET-3则明显抑制P-Smad3的表达(P〈0.05)。结论ET-1可诱导MMA375细胞TGF-β1的高表达,ET-3有相反的作用。ET受体-A介导ET-1诱导的TGF—β通路信号蛋白Smad3的磷酸化。
Objective To investigate the effects ofendothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin-3 (ET-3) on the expression of transformation growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) and phosphorylation of Smad 3 in malignant melanoma cell line, A375. Methods Cultured A375 cells were classified into 5 groups, i.e. control group (no stimulation), ET-1 group (stimulated with ET-1), ET-1 + BQ123 group (treated with ET-1 and BQ123), ET-1 + BQ788 group (treated with ET-1 and BQ788), ET-3 group (stimulated with ET-3), to receive different stimulation. The working concentrations were 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 nmol/L for ET-1 and ET-3, 10μmol/L for BQ123 and BQ788. After another 12- and 24-hour culture, ELISA, RT-PCR and Western blot were used to detect the expression of TGF-β1 protein and mRNA as well as phosphorylated Smad 3 (P-Smad 3 ). Results The expression of TGF-β1 in A375 cells was up-regulated by ET-1, but down-regulated by ET-3, and both of the effects were in a concentration-dependent manner. Under the stimulation with ET-1 and ET-3 of 100 nmol/L, the level of TGF-β1 reached 1289.38 ±89.42 ng/L per 10^5 ceils and 85.09 ± 9.37 ng/L per 10^5 cells, respectively, significantly different from that in unstimulated cells (both P 〈 0.05). BQ123 significantly blocked the up-regulatory effect of ET-1 on the expression TGF-β1 protein(P 〈 0.05 ), but BQ788 had no significant influence on the effect, so was the case with TGF-β1 mRNA. Western blot revealed that ET-1 significantly elevated the expression of P-Smad 3 in A375 cells (P 〈 0.05 ), and the elevation was significantly inhibited by BQ123, but not by BQ788. The expression of P-Smad 3 was statistically decreased by ET-3 in A375 cells (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions The expression of TGF-β1 could be enhanced by ET-1, but suppressed by ET-3. It is likely that endothelin receptor A mediates the phosphorylation of Smad 3 induced by ET-1.