中文摘要：

在当前强调产业结构调整的政策背景下.产业有序转移必须以有利于或者加强环境保护为基本目标。环境规制差异造成了不同经济地域之间污染密集型生产的比较优势调整.强化了高污染产业进行生产区位选择的动机.以规避来自政府的环境监管。环境治理成本的不同是高污染企业区际转移的重要驱动因素.企业环境寻求策略推动了污染密集型生产由环境规制强度高的地区向环境规制松弛地区的转移。企业污染密集型生产的区际转移受到环境要素产品生产比较优势的明显影响.这些环境要素产品与区际环境规制差异、企业市场内部化战略以及污染密集型产品的生命周期密切关联。借鉴一般均衡分析框架.可以明晰企业环境寻求策略下污染密集型生产转移的内在机制。一方面.环境成本差异决定了非环境友好产品生产转移的意愿.高强度的环境规制使得企业生产的边际环境治理成本和平均环境治理成本提高.污染密集型生产外迁的动力加强.生产效率高的企业对环境规制强度更加敏感。污染密集型生产承接地提高环境规制强度能形成对环境负面影响的有力对冲.遏制环境恶化趋势。另一方面.合理的区际环境政策差异能在产业有序转移中发挥重要作用。合理设定区际环境规制级差与碳信征信系统建设.加强分类监管与行业节能减排.建立拟承接生产项目的效率筛选机制.提高区域市场开放程度、降低产业优惠政策所形成隐性市场保护等环境监管手段是保证欠发达地区通过产业承接实现跨越式发展的关键所在。

英文摘要：

Orderly industry transfer must contribute to or strengthen environmental protection under the current policy context of emphasizing the industrial structure adjustment. The differences of environmental regulation between the different economic regions caused the adjustment of comparative advantage on pollution-intensive production, and strengthened the motivation of production location choice of high pollution industry to avoid environmental regulation from the government. Different environmental costs were an important driving factor of production transfer of high-polluting companies between different regions. Corporate Environmental Strategy promoteed pollution-intensive production to shift from the areas of strict environmental regulation to the areas of loose environmental regulation. The comparative advantage of environmental factors production significantly affected inter-district industrial transfer of the pollution-intensive companies, and the environmental factors products were closely related to interregional differences in environmental regulation, corporate internal market strategy and life cycle of the pollution-intensive product. The internal mechanisms of the pollution- intensive industries transfer can be clear in corporate environment seeking strategy with the general equilibrium f~amework. On the one hand, environmental cost differences determined the wishes of the pollution-intensive industrial transfer, marginal costs and average cost of environmental governance were increased due to strict environmental regulations, and the motivation of pollution-intensive industries transfer was reinforced, the companies of high production efficiency were more sensitive to environmental regulation strength. Increasing the intensity of environmental regulation can form a strong hedge to the negative impact on the enviromnent in order to eventually curb environmental deterioration. On the other hand, reasonable inter-regional differences in enviromnental policies carl play an important role in the orderly ind