中文摘要：

目的：研究刘完素用药性味偏主寒凉还是温补,其处方功效的寒温偏性,以方剂计量学指标分析刘完素医学流派思想。方法：运用传统文献与方剂计量学研究相结合的方法,并选取与刘完素时代相近的金元其他3家作对比,从中显示其处方方剂计量学特点。结果：平均每方所用温补药次,李东垣（1.10）最高,朱丹溪（0.78）、刘完素（0.77）次之,张子和（0.65）最低。平均每方所用寒凉药次排序为李东垣（1.34）,张子和（1.00）,刘完素（0.94）,朱丹溪（0.80）;金元四家温凉用药比,朱丹溪最高（0.97）,李东垣（0.83）、刘完素（0.82）次之,张子和（0.58）最低。金元四家寒温处方率比较,张子和（1.50）寒温处方比值最高,刘完素（0.87）,李东垣（0.76）,朱丹溪（0.50）。结论：刘完素是＂火热论＂的倡导者,但用药不宥于寒凉,称其为＂河间学派＂更为恰当。单以用药频次评论医家是偏寒凉还是温补有失偏颇,如何识证更为重要。

英文摘要：

Objective： To study the nature and flavour of LIU Wan-su’ drug application and the tendency of cold or warm in his prescription; analyze LIU Wan-su’s medical sect by the index of prescription metrology. Methods： Combining the traditional documents with prescription metrology, selecting three doctors before or after LIU Wan-su in Jin and Yuan Dynasty as comparison to expose the characteristic of prescription metrology in his prescription. Results： Wen tonic frequency of each prescription on average, LI Dong- yuan （1.34）,ZHANG Zi-he （1.00）, LIU Wan-su （0.94）, ZHU Dan-xi（0.80）; Cool and warm drug ratio of four sects in Jin and Yuan Dyanstay, ZHU Dan-xi （0.97）,LI Dong-yuan （ 0.83 ） , LIU Wan-su （0.82）, ZHNAG Zi-he （ 0.58 ） .Cool and warm prescription ratio, ZHANG Zi-he （ 1.50 ） , LIU Wan-su （0.87）, LI Dong-yuan （ 0.76 ） , ZHU Dan-xi （0.50）.Conclusion： As the exponent of ＂theory of fire and hot＂, it will be better to classify LIU Wan-su as ＂ Hejian sect＂ since his drug application was not limited within cold and cool. To some extent, it is more important to judge a Chinese traditional doctor by syndrome identification rather than only by his drug frequency.