位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
医学影像云存储模型的研究与设计
  • ISSN号:1000-386X
  • 期刊名称:《计算机应用与软件》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:S237[农业科学—农业机械化工程;农业科学—农业工程] U463.42[机械工程—车辆工程;交通运输工程—载运工具运用工程;交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
  • 作者机构:[1]首都师范大学信息工程学院,北京100048, [2]北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京100097, [3]国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京100097
  • 相关基金:国家“863”高技术研究发展计划项目(2013AA102308); 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31571564,31571563); 北京市科技计划课题(D161100003216003)
中文摘要:

针对车轮转角直接测量法在工程实践中角度传感器安装困难且转轴易断裂的现象,结合车轮转向过程,提出了位移式间接转角测量法和四连杆式间接转角测量法。依据位移式和四连杆式2种间接测量方法原理,分别建立转角测量模型,以雷沃M800型拖拉机为基础,构建自动导航试验平台,通过转角测量试验、沥青路面与农田环境下的导航精度对比试验,分析四连杆式间接测量法、位移式间接测量法和直接测量法3种方法的应用效果。转角测量对比试验结果表明,3种方法的角度值最大误差为0.081°,平均误差分别为0.061°、0.014°和0.017°,小于传感器的测量精度0.088°,3种测量方法测量的测量精度一致。通过沥青路面与农田环境2种地况试验测试,沥青路面上和农田环境下,3种方法的横向偏差平均值的最大值分别为0.235 9、0.364 5、0.498 4 cm,试验表明3种测量方法的导航精度一致。相对于位移式间接转角测量法和直接测量法,在沥青路面上和农田环境下,四连杆式间接测量法导航精度标准差最小,分别为0.890 4和1.297 5 cm。四连杆式间接转角测量法所采用的四连杆式角度传感器安装简便、易于防护,无摩擦损耗,可代替直接转角测量法,应用于实践中。

英文摘要:

Wheel swivel angle is regarded as a critical parameter in agriculture automatic navigation system, and it can always be measured by using angle sensor. In engineering practice, angle sensor is difficult to fix, and the shaft is easily broken. In order to solve the problem, displacement indirect measurement method and four-bar indirect measurement method are proposed in this paper. Wheel rotation depends on steering cylinder piston movement, and the movement of steering cylinder piston causes the movement of steering trapezoidal mechanism. Therefore it is available to apply displacement sensor in measuring the position of the steering cylinder piston rod, and the displacement sensor is parallel fixed with the steering cylinder. Referring to the motion of steering trapezoidal mechanism, it is proposed to use the front axle, knuckle arm, connecting rod and pendulum rod to form a four-bar linkage. According to the fixed location of the displacement sensor and four-bar angle sensor, it is available to establish measurement models for those 2 indirect measurement methods, and calibrate the relation between sensor measurement and wheel swivel angle, but those 3 measurement methods are incapable to measure the real wheel swivel angle. In the 2 kinematic models of wheel vehicle, wheel swivel angle is the angle between wheel axis and vehicle body axis, and thus Ackerman transformation must be used for converting the test angle into wheel swivel angle. However, different vehicles are different in the transformation of Ackerman, and the ideal Ackerman transformation cannot be used. In fact, the rotation angles of left and right wheels have little bias with the wheel swivel angle when the wheel swivel angle is being in a small range in the middle of the pair. Therefore it is supposed that the measurement angle is the wheel swivel angle. Through automatic navigation precision comparison experiment, the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement methods are compared. The experiment is performed on basis of the LOVOL

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《计算机应用与软件》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:上海科学院
  • 主办单位:上海市计算技术研究所 上海计算机软件技术开发中心
  • 主编:朱三元
  • 地址:上海市愚园路546号
  • 邮编:200040
  • 邮箱:cas@sict.stc.sh.cn
  • 电话:021-62254715 62520070-505
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1000-386X
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:31-1260/TP
  • 邮发代号:4-379
  • 获奖情况:
  • 全国计算机类中文核心期刊
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 波兰哥白尼索引,美国剑桥科学文摘,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:27463